Quote Originally Posted by jamessr
If the patient still suffers from the same condition as they did when the 1 yr expires. It would be unrealistic for any Dr. to say in their professional judgment, opinion, the patient no longer has a qualifying condition when the scientific medical evidence shows otherwise. see People v. Windus....the attorney general of cali. tried that one already. and lost.

So yes, defrauding is the only legal logical reality.....unless the patient is faking the condition claimed in the first place.


Are you a doctor? A doctor could change their medical opinion of the best way for a patient to go about treatment after 1+ year, and no they wouldn't face any sort of repercussions from that.

In the Windus case, the patient's doctor actually testified that the patient not only qualified, but needed roughly 6-8 times the amount presumed under California's SB420.


If your doctor will still back you, you'd be fine. As in the People v Windus case, however, if your doctor doesn't feel you should still be treated with MMJ, you're up shit's creek. Unless you can get another doc.