Quote Originally Posted by jamessr
The easiest way is to file a quo warranto/ ex post facto constitutional claim motion. The one yr issue is not born on a patient, it is born upon the dr.....Since our legislation does state in plain lingo in respects to a regular medications and standard treatments must fail. The legal effect is the same as if it is a prescribed medicine the doctor is recommending.

The cali. case does go to your thoughts here. People v. Windus.....:thumbsup:


In regards to the bold part, if that is true, then the 1 yr expiration does in fact apply, as prescriptions expire after 1 year. This is the source of the language in these authorizations btw, so that seems to make sense.

Either way, why would a doctor not be able to set a time limit on a recommendation? Someone who receives a single prescription at one point in time for morphine (say that had surgery) can not use morphine the rest of their life (without another prescription), morphine is schedule 2, and one would expect the laws governing the expiration of recommendation for marijuana, a schedule 1 drug, to be at least as severe.
justpics Reviewed by justpics on . Loop Hole? Say your get your authorization from a doc in the box who specializes in mmj authorizations with patients with a valid medical history and they put an expiration on your authorization (not in the law, they don't expire). What if you then go to your regular doctor, who wouldn't sign around the time your expiration date is coming on your doc in the box authorization, and the regular doc finds your conditions are still the same, you can carry on without fear from LEO because expiration's aren't Rating: 5