Yes gypski that is true. But when you have a state prosecutor claiming NO AUTHORIZATION IS FOR LIFE, it becomes a cluster fuck free for all. It becomes a real DOG FIGHT with shit hitting the fan every direction. A patient has a hard time wading through the DOG SHIT and it's smell.

It all boils down too the FINACIAL INTEREST of the doctor and non-physician owner/operator fee splitting scam. Not to mention the states interest in prosecuting patients the doc in the box owners/operators feeding patients to the state on a constant basis, depending on what part of the law the state wishes to challenge. The state gets what is known as a quid-pro-quo, a declaration of guilt from the non-physician owner/operator, not the signing physician under RCW 18.71 or 18.57.

A court will take the quid-pro-quo because unless the corp. officer, director or CEO committs some sort of illegal act which can be proven, the patient is at a huge disadvantage with claiming an aff. def......the DR. gets hidden behind the CEO's professional business opinion. This is a huge issue for all us patients as a whole. A true unethical violation we are subjected too by this, from all the professionals involved combined.