Quote Originally Posted by palerider7777
In a special concurring opinion, Judge Alan Loeb wrote that Colorado's consitutional amendment legalizing medical marijuana "cries out for legislative action."


Attorney General John Suthers applauded the decision.

"I am pleased to see the Court of Appeals' has provided legal support for our case that a caregiver, under Amendment 20, must do more than simply provide marijuana to a patient," Suthers said. "I also was pleased to see the assertion in the special concurrence that Amendment 20 'cries out for legislative action.' I could not agree more. I hope the legislature will act and create a regulatory framework that gives substance to the Court of Appeals' findings

this was posted yesterday 09 not 06 seems they do infact or would like to use this as a witch hunt?since in fact the vote that happened a few months back was clearly shot down why would these 2 still say it crys for action?
If you read the opinion, you will find that Judge Loeb is talking about the fact that many transactions under the law, while legal for a patient or a "designated caregiver," are illegal for the supplier. This is in fact true, and is why the dispensaries are having a hard time keeping up with demand. The judge is right that it "cries out" to be fixed, but the idea that the legislature might be charged with the task doesn't thrill me.