The key word there is may.This is the section that was meant to create a lock step or top down system of control.

All of this is moot.The fact is if marijuana was dangerouss why did they add qualifying conditions.

I think the confusion here is medical marijuana is a reccomendation and comes from the advice of a physician,and not a prescription.The board can not interfere with the treatment of a physician.

What has happened is that the branch of the DOH that regulates medical practice has said marijuana has accepted medical use,and the branch that regulates controlled substances refuses to apply the medical science used to add qualifying conditions to the state schedule 1 test.RCW 201 was addressed by the HQAC,but the Board refuses to acknowledge all the information that was submitted to add qualifying conditions.

One interesting thing is the board admitted marijuana has accepted medical use.If you check I think you will find that no branch of government anywhere that regulates controlled substances has admitted that.

I could not afford to litigate that yet..but I will if nobody else does.
sandybarr Reviewed by sandybarr on . ACLU VIOLATES OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT.. AGAIN Hello, For too many years now the ACLU has been meeting with law enforcement in private to determine medical marijuana policies. This practice is not only unethical it is against the law. This policy decision should only be made by an open rule making process that is open to everybody, and not by clandestine meetings for the special few. The history of the ACLU meddling into medical marijuana is now well documented. In the past enforceable policies have been developed for Rating: 5