James sr.

If I were you I would make the argument that marijuana is legal crops no longer subject to the controlled substances act because it no longer meets the criteria outlined in the state schedule 1 test.

Research the issue thoroughly.Hanson did not rule correctly and things have changed since Hanson. Hanson ruled that no agency had ruled that marijuana had accepted medical use..they were flat out wrong the Health and quality assurances Commission did rule marijuana had accepted medical use when they added qualifying conditions.Furthermore I have since challenged the state scheduling and instead of applying the state schedule 1 test,they applied the another test (a thru I)which is not what keeps marijuana in schedule 1(I think it is the test that puts it there originally).

Hanson acknowledges that the state schedule 1 test needs to be applied,and the board when asked to apply it refused to do so.

This time instead of failing to argue that an agency has determined marijuana has accepted medical use,and bringing up that someone has asked the board to apply the schedule 1 test...and the board refused could force the courts to apply the state schedule 1 test ,using the decision to add qualifying conditions.

I hope it is not too late for you to make those arguments.I believe the state schedule 1 test will take a ruling to be properly applied.When the courts have looked at this in Hanson they have determined that the state schedule 1 test was the proper determination to see if marijuana still belonged in schedule 1...only they erred when determining that no agency had ruled marijuana had acceptable medical use.Since the board has punted and you know the qualifying conditions had been added by a professional agency that regulates medical practice,you can make these arguments in the lower court.

Read Hanson and see if you can figure out my argument.Then read the boards decision not to apply the state schedule 1 test.It will be hard for the lower court to rule that the state schedule 1 test is not the test to keep marijuana in schedule 1,since Hanson has already reasoned that it is.

You need to re argue Hanson in the lower courts and take it to division II if you have to.Then you will have crops instead of controlled substances.
sandybarr Reviewed by sandybarr on . ACLU VIOLATES OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT.. AGAIN Hello, For too many years now the ACLU has been meeting with law enforcement in private to determine medical marijuana policies. This practice is not only unethical it is against the law. This policy decision should only be made by an open rule making process that is open to everybody, and not by clandestine meetings for the special few. The history of the ACLU meddling into medical marijuana is now well documented. In the past enforceable policies have been developed for Rating: 5