sandy, your on point with the gonz. v. or. caselaw, my point was that you may have missed the other end of the argument...

As for the orvald and 61 plants, THCF and Orvald refuses to put any plant #'s on any papers, just an end result amount, my sons was 600 grams for every 60-days, mine was 3.oz. the oregon state limit, we both have the same condition and saw him 3 months apart... not to mention it was before any limits went into effect, yes just as the guy in kitsap county case, he sealed our criminal case in that respect...in our favor:thumbsup: we both got orvald documents to replace the fraudulent ones signed by dodge, FREE OF CHARGE AND FOR LIFE, SO SAID ORVALD AND STANFORD, TILL NOW!!!

it's a matter of time on that case of the 61 plants(they charged my son but not me for the house and plants) then a yr later charged me for possession of 9.59 grams in which I really had 35 grams, the WSP cop smoked the rest to his head. Paul said I don't have any valid documents because THCF documents only is good for 1 yr., SOOOOO, THIS GUY IS STATING HE IS A DR. UNDER 18.57-18.71, LOOK AT THE CASELAW BEHIND THE PRACTICE OF MEDICINE AND CORPORATE PRACTICE OF MEDICINE IN WA....OOOPS, HE FUCKED UP BY EVEN LOOKING AT MY MEDICAL RECORDS AND SENDING THEM OUT OF STATE TO WASHINGTON FROM THE MAIN RECORDS DEPT. IN PORTLAND OREGON, not to mention I never ever saw orvald in washington, lol, I am a dual resident, and got both states covered from both dodge and orvald..... NOW WHAT??? RICO?? GENERAL WARRANTS ARE ILLEGAL IN WA. AND THE FEDERAL COURTS ALREADY RULED THEY CAN'T SUBPOENA ANY OF THCF MEDICAL RECORDS AND MUST US A DIFFERENT WAY TO GET THE INFO... CORRECT?:thumbsup: REMEMBER, ORVALD CERTIFIED MY RECOMMENDATION....

So if ling had his license in wa. when you was associated so to speak, then why are you in fear of rico??? steve is not any place in the act, your tie is with ling... correct??

p.s. fuck the aclu and normal political crap....they are morons...
jamessr Reviewed by jamessr on . ACLU VIOLATES OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT.. AGAIN Hello, For too many years now the ACLU has been meeting with law enforcement in private to determine medical marijuana policies. This practice is not only unethical it is against the law. This policy decision should only be made by an open rule making process that is open to everybody, and not by clandestine meetings for the special few. The history of the ACLU meddling into medical marijuana is now well documented. In the past enforceable policies have been developed for Rating: 5