No 8th amendment or fourth amended argument that has used the latest case law has lost. They can not interefere with the medical treatment of a physician.Gonzales v. Oregon is the new argument on the block.You are stuck in the media world of Norml/Raich yada yada.

Orvald is a legal physician in Washington state.They licensed him.if he was not a legal physician then they should not have licensed him.As long as the DOH has him listed as a legal Washington State Phycisian I am safe.The same goes for Ling.Then there is the qualifying condition.Either you have one or you don't.

Gonzales v Oregon is the line of scrimmage now.the releationship with you and your doctor.It always has been the line of scrimmage since the U.S. Supreme court made that ruling.Besides Raich was never implemented.Nor did it create a precedence.The U.S. Supreme Court can only suggest that Congress can regulate interstate commerce.The same Supreme court said you can't regulate medical practice.Even in Conant v Walters the feds acknowledge they can't regulate medical practice.

The can't force regulatory schemes on states either because Congress did not pass anything specific to implement Raich and allow federal regulatory schemes,even then the anti commandeering doctrine would have to be overturned..which it wasn't.

That is why they condition federal funding to get compliance beacsue they have never and will never be able to prohibit state medical marijuana laws.Even the ACLU knows that I have their explanation behind closed doors in writing.But in public they will tell you Raich blah blah blah high court blah blah blah.

So along comes Ganzales v Oregon and an cements the line of scrimmage to states controling medical practice.WSHQAC regulates medical practice.they say medical marijuana has medical value and add qualifying conditions.Then they set the plant limit..because they can regulate medical practice..But they put a release valve that restores to decision to you and your dr.Because they have been down the road of pain management with opiates and they are still being sued for regulating opiate pain management.In the end the have to leave it up to your DR. And you have the right to refuse or accept that medical treatment. Ganzales v Oregon fucking cements it.

Time for you to put down the ACLU,and Norml cirlulars and take a good look at where the line of scrimmage is here pal. Gonzales v Oregon

I would be wasting my time siding with someone that thinks otherwise.