Well sandybarr, look at this. If the 15 plant limit is a real issue then lets find out why? So when you look at the city of aberdeens dtf website, they claim each plant is worth $4,800, so 15x $4,800= $72,000, the courts just changed the superior court jurisdiction upto $75,000 from $50,000, that means one can't bring forth a civil claim in the proper jurisdiction to make a claim, CORRECT? (risk management !!)

Now look at the Grays Harbor Superior court case my son & I have in that county(Mr. Hardgroves jurisdiction) 61 plants x $4,800 x 3=$878,400, just in CROPS( under the timber statutes, it's treble damages automatically) not to mention the amount of equipment they destroyed worth over $30,000.

My son set down in Whitman county(I suggest you get copies of the documents he filed, under James E.Barber jr. aka Barber Bishop) that mmj is NOT CONTRABAND for any mmj patient, meaning NOT A CRIMINAL OFFENSE under RCW 69.50 AND THE STATE IS WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO SEIZE LAWFUL PROPERTY OR FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES UNDER 69.50, unfortunately he is in prison in alaska for trumped up cs charges & he is looking at 5-10 years, so he can't continue the fight here, as he now has others..

You forgot to follow the contracts of the dtf, THE MONEY TRAIN BRO,(copies of the cash warrants under CTED, they are ONLY allowed to investigate DRUG TRAFFICKING, not medical treatment for the "use" of the substance of mj, which is not to be IMPAIRED...

Your 14th amend argument will fail, without the state first acknowledging your statutory rights under RCW 69.51A et. seq., this means they must give you back medicine without filing any motions for it to get it back...

Your 8th amendment will also fail, because you don't have the 3rd prong established yet under that amendment.. see the case in the state of california, city of L.A. homeless people case... What you have is a summary judgment on what you have before the court, AS IT IS RIGHT NOW,YOU MISSED VERY IMPORTANT FACTS AND CASELAW.......

This is the reason I asked you to send me EVERYTHING you have:thumbsup:, not to tell me read what you put on-line, because you didn't put it all on-line, and rather than airing it out here or on other sites, I just want it all to read for myself( for your benefit), we have been at this since before the law came out, and changed much policy without issues.. so buck up bro.. imp:
jamessr Reviewed by jamessr on . ACLU VIOLATES OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT.. AGAIN Hello, For too many years now the ACLU has been meeting with law enforcement in private to determine medical marijuana policies. This practice is not only unethical it is against the law. This policy decision should only be made by an open rule making process that is open to everybody, and not by clandestine meetings for the special few. The history of the ACLU meddling into medical marijuana is now well documented. In the past enforceable policies have been developed for Rating: 5