Like I said there may be value in the co-op approach,who knows we might end up with both.I prefer it be run as a regular business with insurance for bad products,which is why I won't go to any of these clubs out there now.I have been told too many times that they can not guarentee the quality of their products.Can you imagine going to Dick's and getting sick all the time and having them tell you they can't guarantee the quality of their product.It is unacceptable.

As far as not being alowed in the meeting because I am not a co-op,that is horsehockey.Perhaps I want to use them at some point but I won't until they are responsible for the products they sell,or have some sort of regulatory system in place.I simply don't trust the clubs that are out there now to develop a safety standard.These people in my opinion are just trying to sell as much pot as they can and could give a rip if they sell tainted or moldy pot.

However selling to thouands of patients that do not do anything but show up and buy pot is a dispensary.Green cross is a dispensary..most of them are like that very few are actiually co-ops.

I have been told it would be best to wait until after the budget hearing process is over to go down to the county council to gripe about this so I can get my full two minutes.
sandybarr Reviewed by sandybarr on . ACLU VIOLATES OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT.. AGAIN Hello, For too many years now the ACLU has been meeting with law enforcement in private to determine medical marijuana policies. This practice is not only unethical it is against the law. This policy decision should only be made by an open rule making process that is open to everybody, and not by clandestine meetings for the special few. The history of the ACLU meddling into medical marijuana is now well documented. In the past enforceable policies have been developed for Rating: 5