Results 1 to 10 of 12
-
09-29-2009, 07:18 PM #1OPSenior Member
Senate Panel REJECTS Public Option
Speaks for itself
Senate panel rejects public healthcare option | Politics | ReutersIslandborn Reviewed by Islandborn on . Senate Panel REJECTS Public Option Speaks for itself Senate panel rejects public healthcare option | Politics | Reuters Rating: 5There is an extremely fine line between genius and psycho.
32 years and I\'ve never met a good cop.
-
09-29-2009, 07:39 PM #2OPSenior Member
Senate Panel REJECTS Public Option
The Democrats now, i assume, will attempt to enact a public option by tweaking the failed proposal and giving it another name. Nonetheless, todays vote was good news.:jointsmile:
There is an extremely fine line between genius and psycho.
32 years and I\'ve never met a good cop.
-
09-29-2009, 09:23 PM #3Senior Member
Senate Panel REJECTS Public Option
:thumbsup:
-
09-30-2009, 02:34 AM #4Senior Member
Senate Panel REJECTS Public Option
Thats good and without the public option there's really nothing else to vote for. Maybe some of the states will look at the issue. I'm for a public option, just not federally.
-
09-30-2009, 01:59 PM #5Member
Senate Panel REJECTS Public Option
This is probably one of the worst things that could have happened. I sure hope they bring the PO back during the reconciliation process. Without this, the insurance companies will continue to rape and pillage. Let's think about this...what valued added role do the insurance companies play in the delivery of healthcare...NONE! They are just the middle man between our money and the providers. And they make billions playing that role. Since they are driven by a profit motive, all they want to do is to deny coverage for the smallest of excuses. We cannot claim to be a great society if we allow people to be killed when they are sick. Talk about Death Panels. The only thing I will ever agree with Sarah Palin on(please God..don't strike me dead). We have Death Panels today and it's not the government. It's the adjudicators that get hefty bonuses based on how many claims they deny. Without PO, this is not reform...it's a whitewash.
Unfortunately, MOST of the ignorant have been brainwashed by the extreme right wing funded by the insurance companies and we may not see a good PO. In any case, the current version of PO is not going to be available to everyone but only those that are not covered from their employers and cannot get insurance. Oh well...c'est la vie!! Let's kill thousands more of our unfortunate fellow citizens.
-
09-30-2009, 03:15 PM #6Senior Member
Senate Panel REJECTS Public Option
Originally Posted by mrchanger
the addition of a public option introduces an entirely new level of corruption into an industry that is already easily taken advantage of. to believe that government does not receive some sort of profit from their meddling is naive. their profit comes in the form of further control over a profitable industry, a control not shared with the people they represent, and an infusion of billions more dollars in the form of premiums to do with as they please. that public option would also place the fates of millions of americans more firmly in the grasp of the bureaucrats of the nanny state, whose actions and intentions are artfully hidden from the very people who provide their salaries and their power. where a corporation may be held accountable through the marketplace, government's armed might makes it impervious to any justice the people may wish to hand down.
the mob, in its quest for more "free stuff", seems incapable of looking beyond its immediate needs. the intent of the founders of this country seems to have been to create a balance between the needs of the individual and the desires of the mob and this experiment has yet to run its course. we are constantly faced with those who say, "but nationalized health care works just fine elsewhere". i suggest they look closely at those elsewheres for a difference between those societies and our own. in most of those societies there is a distinct limiting of personal freedoms and intrusion into the people's everyday lives that we would consider unacceptable. perhaps those dissatisfied with our way of life should emigrate to those more loving climes. i would thoroughly enjoy seeing how well canada, great britain or france would cope with millions of our poor flooding across their borders and demanding free health care, a place to live and the means of existence. i doubt they would be as accepting as we are of the millions who choose to immigrate here.
-
09-30-2009, 03:23 PM #7OPSenior Member
Senate Panel REJECTS Public Option
Originally Posted by mrchanger
Let the Dems pass this joke of a healthcare bill through reconciliation, bring it on. They will be finished. Even the bloggers on Daily Kos and Huff and PUffington post agree thats true. So bring it on Govt. boobie suckers, your gonna lose.:jointsmile:There is an extremely fine line between genius and psycho.
32 years and I\'ve never met a good cop.
-
09-30-2009, 04:29 PM #8OPSenior Member
Senate Panel REJECTS Public Option
Breaking- Senate downed by vote of 13-10 govt. sponsored with taxpayer money abortions. This gets better and better everyday. Im pro-choice but not with my $, your mistake, your resposibility.:jointsmile:
There is an extremely fine line between genius and psycho.
32 years and I\'ve never met a good cop.
-
09-30-2009, 07:06 PM #9Senior Member
Senate Panel REJECTS Public Option
is it any wonder why healthcare in USA is #37 on the list of countries....I can go to canada or europe and be cured of hepititus....here in the states they wont cure you.... they will only treat your symtoms
Why cure people and solve the problem when we (pharmaceuticals) can make money hand over fist suppling pills that only treat the symtems
"US was ranked #72 on "Level of Health" (snuggled between Argentina-71 and Bhutan-73) and #37 (between Costa Rica-36 and Slovenia-38) on "Overall Health System Performance", according to the World Health Organization. See:
Health system attainment and performance in all Member States
"The United States is the wealthiest, mightiest country in all of human history, and yet it has a higher proportion of poor or, worse, hungry citizens than almost every other industrialized nation. ...The Luxembourg Income Study, which has been tracking household incomes of twenty-five countries for more than twenty years, recently compared nations' relative poverty rates. 'Relative' poverty is defined as a household making less than 50 percent of the national median income. In Finland, Norway, and Sweden, poverty rates range between 5.4 percent and 6.5 percent. Of our two neighbors, Canada and Mexico, the United States' poverty rate is much closer to Mexico, 22.1 percent. The U.S. poverty rate is 17 percent, according to the Luxembourg study, only 1.8 percent lower than Russia's."
-
09-30-2009, 07:44 PM #10OPSenior Member
Senate Panel REJECTS Public Option
Originally Posted by VapedG13
And what happened to all the transparancy? Posting Bills for 72 hours? Liberal wing of Dems blocked another attempt at that today. Cowardly people. The real Democrats have already begun abandoning this President if ya havent already noticed.There is an extremely fine line between genius and psycho.
32 years and I\'ve never met a good cop.
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Illinois Senate panel OKs medical marijuana measure
By Psycho4Bud in forum Medical Marijuana NewsReplies: 0Last Post: 03-07-2008, 02:28 AM -
US Senate panel rejects Iraq plan
By HinduKush83 in forum PoliticsReplies: 10Last Post: 01-25-2007, 04:52 AM -
Ahmadinejad rejects UN sanctions
By Great Spirit in forum PoliticsReplies: 1Last Post: 12-24-2006, 09:15 PM -
Senate Rejects U.S. Troop Pullout in Iraq
By Psycho4Bud in forum PoliticsReplies: 26Last Post: 06-26-2006, 04:14 AM -
Senate Panel Rejects NSA Probe
By amsterdam in forum PoliticsReplies: 2Last Post: 03-11-2006, 04:42 PM