..."it is a mistake to theorize without first having facts. Inevitably, one begins to twist facts to suit theories, rather than theories to suit facts."

Quote Originally Posted by Weezard
From what I've read of your posts, yep, I think you're good.

Mahalo fo' volunteer.
I'm hoping Molasses does good things fo' Cannabis, 'cause it's simple and inexpensive.
Jus' my kine sing!:rastasmoke::hippy::thumbsup:

Mahalo brah!
Might be a week or so until I have 4 decent cuttings for my test.
Been having major problems with some new coco.

Always sumpin, yah?

Alo Ha
Weeze
Heya Weez! I've just taken six clones from a lovely new mum, and so far, they're doing all right. I've put four of 'em in a homebrew bubble cloner (two in rockwool, two in rapid rooters), and two of 'em in dixie cups with soil.

Assuming all of 'em take root, I will be putting 'em in the main garden and trying the ST/Molasses thing in hydro on the four, and in the two remaining in soil. Have to get my existing crop out first, and that is proving difficult, as I think I heat-stressed 'em pretty bad for a couple of weeks. Toronto heat waves are a bitch for those of us without air conditioning.

I want to see if there is a difference in using ST/Molasses, as well as the difference in speed and/or quality of growth with hydro (DWC) versus soil. Since all girls are from the same healthy mum (which is WW, if my deductions are correct...), it should be a reasonable experiment. Am planning on doing one plant with ST & Mo enhancement, one with just ST, one with just Mo, and one as the control with just basic nutes. For the two in soil, I'm planning on doing one with everything 'bonus-y' I can throw at it, and one with just my two-part DNF nutes.

A better way to do it would be to take a larger garden, with a few hundred plants, and do a proper double-blind test, but that will have to wait until I'm r!ch (and living in HamsterDamn)