PLZ COME HELP & SUPPORT US SEPTEMBER 1ST!

[nicole1285]

[align=center][/align]

"WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF EVALUATING HOW MEDICAL MARIJUANA COLLECTIVES AND CO-OPS SHOULD BE TREATED'

so now is the time to ask the board of supervisors to regualate collectives and co-ops.

PLZ COME JOIN ME (US) AND HELP CULTNATE CHANGE IN OUR BACKYARDS.
YOU WILL ALSO RECEIVE A FREE T-SHIRT ...

HOPE TO SEE EVERYONE THERE!

RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISRS
4080 LEMON ST.
RIVERSIDE, CA[align=center][align=center][/align][/align]

nicole1285 Reviewed by nicole1285 on 08-26-2009. PLZ COME HELP & SUPPORT US SEPTEMBER 1ST! "WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF EVALUATING HOW MEDICAL MARIJUANA COLLECTIVES AND CO-OPS SHOULD BE TREATED' so now is the time to ask the board of supervisors to regualate collectives and co-ops. PLZ COME JOIN ME (US) AND HELP CULTNATE CHANGE IN OUR BACKYARDS. YOU WILL ALSO RECEIVE A FREE T-SHIRT ... HOPE TO SEE EVERYONE THERE! RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISRS Rating: 5

[dumblazystoner]

I will never support any political effort that attempts to legalize cannabis use to a select few based on them meeting "special" criteria medical or otherwise. No one is any more "entitled" to use cannabis due to a medical condition, cannabis should be available to everyone regardless of why they choose to use it, if it were, then those that sought it's use for a medical condition would be freely allowed to use it and the cost to acquire said, "medicine" would be significantly less than it is now. Simply advocating for "medical use" to the exclusion of all others, is bigoted and wrong. While I admire your efforts, your energy is misplaced, and if you are honest w/ yourself, surely you can see the obvious flaw in supporting a political position that claims that it's only ok to use cannabis so long you got 150$$ and can ask any number of the ass hat doctors that write recs to do so, but for anyone else, it's wrong and illegal? Explain to me what entitles you or any other MMJ user to use cannabis legally, while turning a blind eye and not advocating it's legal use for every person no matter the reason?
Medical conditions do not give people "special rights", everyone should have the same opportunity to use cannabis, a piece of paper w/ the CA state seal and Dr. signature does not change the fact that it is already a harmless substance that can have a positive impact on anyone that chooses to use it, even if they happen to not have that "special paper tiger".:jointsmile:
You have been duped.:jointsmile:

[dumblazystoner]

PS Hey Nicole, tell Ryan I said hi. Be safe out there. As you know, it is a dangerous place.

[mozonian]

Hi, I am new to this site and the whole prop 215 and sb420 thing.... being on the legal side of it that is... i would love to get involved with the riverside county stuff and maybe even more. I just signed up for this forum last night so i am unable to go to this event but i would definately be interested in future events. Please let me know if there is anything that I could do to help.

[mozonian]

I will never support any political effort that attempts to legalize cannabis use to a select few based on them meeting "special" criteria medical or otherwise. No one is any more "entitled" to use cannabis due to a medical condition, cannabis should be available to everyone regardless of why they choose to use it, if it were, then those that sought it's use for a medical condition would be freely allowed to use it and the cost to acquire said, "medicine" would be significantly less than it is now. Simply advocating for "medical use" to the exclusion of all others, is bigoted and wrong. While I admire your efforts, your energy is misplaced, and if you are honest w/ yourself, surely you can see the obvious flaw in supporting a political position that claims that it's only ok to use cannabis so long you got 150$$ and can ask any number of the ass hat doctors that write recs to do so, but for anyone else, it's wrong and illegal? Explain to me what entitles you or any other MMJ user to use cannabis legally, while turning a blind eye and not advocating it's legal use for every person no matter the reason?
Medical conditions do not give people "special rights", everyone should have the same opportunity to use cannabis, a piece of paper w/ the CA state seal and Dr. signature does not change the fact that it is already a harmless substance that can have a positive impact on anyone that chooses to use it, even if they happen to not have that "special paper tiger".:jointsmile:
You have been duped.:jointsmile:

Not to pick a fight, but in some instances, this being one of them, baby steps are needed. The legalization of marijuana would never go from illegal to completly legal in one shot. I honestly believe you will and would waste more energy going for a home run rather than a bunch of singles.

Just my 2 cents.

[leadmagnet]

My policy as a comprehensive drug law reformer for over the last forty years has been to take anything we can get but always be there with the arguments for full drug law reform.

Until up to about the last ten years, in all honesty it's been one baby step forward- two backwards, as it related to cannabis legalization/decriminalization. I attribute most of that to what I refer to as the "prohib-lites" always arguing for only their personal drug of choice.

The "war on drugs" is a war on all of us; users and non-users alike and regardless of your drug of choice. We need to stand up together and fight it as such.

The "war on drugs" is a crime against humanity.