Haven't seen much about purchased human urine

[Burnt Toast]

Toast, please stop insulting me. I have done my research.

So far you have yet to demonstrate anything to establish that you have..

My point is that the Specimen Validity test doesn't have anything to do with whether the urine is synthetic or human.

No, but the SVT is used to determine a non-human sample

If I do the dilution method, I can still fail the SV test if I don't have enough creatinine in my system; that doesn't mean my urine isn't human.

No it means youre sample was 'diluted' (creatinine level between 2-20 mg/dL) Any sample with a creatinine level under 2 mg/dL is ruled "non-human" as I already pointed out.

The genetic test you mention IS the one I'm worried they will ask us to sign off on and take, because they are so fiercely religious and ignorant..

Why in the hell would you think of signing away your rights to be protected from discrimination via genetic profiling?
Know your rights and dont be afraid to assert them. If all what youre saying is true, you need to inform that employer that what they are doing is discriminatory and that you wish to have your lawyer present while signing the consent form. I'll bet you a fin that the employer will fold up like a tent and send that consent form to the shredder.

I don't think you're following what I've written.

Oh Ive followed everything that youve written.

Burnt Toast Reviewed by Burnt Toast on 08-23-2009. Haven't seen much about purchased human urine Hi, I've been reading for a few days and I know that synthetic subs like QuickFix are really popular and seem to show 100% results. BUT I'm worried that labs are now testing for synthetic urine - my company is being bought by some right-wing religious nuts (no offense to other nuts), and I'm worried that they might actually spend the $ to check for synthetic urine. So I bought the powdered human urine from ureasample.com - it was over fifty bucks, but I figure that's a decent price to pay Rating: 5