it's so great huh obama fans?gov fans?have u read any of it? i think not,what about this? odd nobody is talking about this anywhere in the news???

1001
â?¢HR 3200 IH
1 â??â??(B) isâ??
2 â??â??(i) a class III device; or
3 â??â??(ii) a class II device that is implantable,
4 life-supporting, or life-sustaining.
5 â??â??(2) In developing the registry, the Secretary shall,
6 in consultation with the Commissioner of Food and Drugs,
7 the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
8 Services, the head of the Office of the National Coordi9
nator for Health Information Technology, and the Sec10
retary of Veterans Affairs, determine the best methods
11 forâ??
12 â??â??(A) including in the registry, in a manner con13
sistent with subsection (f), appropriate information
14 to identify each device described in paragraph (1) by
15 type, model, and serial number or other unique iden16
tifier;
17 â??â??(B) validating methods for analyzing patient
18 safety and outcomes data from multiple sources and
19 for linking such data with the information included
20 in the registry as described in subparagraph (A), in21
cluding, to the extent feasible, use ofâ??
22 â??â??(i) data provided to the Secretary under
23 other provisions of this chapter; and
24 â??â??(ii) information from public and private
25 sources identified under paragraph (3);
VerDate Nov 24 2008 01:43 Jul 15, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 01001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3200.IH H3200 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
1002
â?¢HR 3200 IH
1 â??â??(C) integrating the activities described in this
2 subsection withâ??
3 â??â??(i) activities under paragraph (3) of sec4
tion 505(k) (relating to active postmarket risk
5 identification);
6 â??â??(ii) activities under paragraph (4) of sec7
tion 505(k) (relating to advanced analysis of
8 drug safety data); and
9 â??â??(iii) other postmarket device surveillance
10 activities of the Secretary authorized by this
11 chapter; and

u read 9?????? notice the 3 iii? notice above there is no iii?notice how it says"surveillance"?? oh theres more.

â??â??(D) providing public access to the data and
13 analysis collected or developed through the registry
14 in a manner and form that protects patient privacy
15 and proprietary information and is comprehensive,
16 useful, and not misleading to patients, physicians,
17 and scientists.
18 â??â??(3)(A) To facilitate analyses of postmarket safety
19 and patient outcomes for devices described in paragraph
20 (1), the Secretary shall, in collaboration with public, aca21
demic, and private entities, develop methods toâ??
22 â??â??(i) obtain access to disparate sources of
23 patient safety and outcomes data, includingâ??
24 â??â??(I) Federal health-related electronic
25 data (such as data from the Medicare pro-
VerDate Nov 24 2008 01:43 Jul 15, 2009 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 01002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3200.IH H3200 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
1003
â?¢HR 3200 IH
1 gram under title XVIII of the Social Secu2
rity Act or from the health systems of the
3 Department of Veterans Affairs);
4 â??â??(II) private sector health-related
5 electronic data (such as pharmaceutical
6 purchase data and health insurance claims
7 data); and
8 â??â??(III) other data as the Secretary
9 deems necessary to permit postmarket as10
sessment of device safety and effectiveness;
11 and
12 â??â??(ii) link data obtained under clause (i)
13 with information in the registry.
14 â??â??(B) In this paragraph, the term â??dataâ?? refers to in15
formation respecting a device described in paragraph (1),
16 including claims data, patient survey data, standardized
17 analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of
18 data from disparate data environments, electronic health
19 records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the
20 Secretary.

for the ones that see nothing wrong with this just know this is being drawn up as if we need this to help keep track of our health.that alone is wrong in it's self being forced to do anything is.but read it good notice how u see lil key words and pharses? read down here from 17 on?? oh it gets better it's ok i'll do the research for ya k?>>>>>>>>>>>>>


. Required coverage, or the so-called individual mandate: American citizens and legal residents would be required to have health insurance or pay a fine. For an individual, the fine would be $750 per year or 2% of household income, whichever is greater. For a family, the maximum fine would be $2,250 per year or 2% of household income

3. Government-run health insurance, or the so-called public option: There is no public option in the Senate bill.

The House bill would establish a government-run insurer that would compete with private insurers

notice what it says in red?hummmm i thought this was to help people not go in biz? notice how they have yet to give any price range for this coverage? notice how it says COMPETE???? i can bet that it's not going to be a helping hand up for our health but rather big gov wanting to get in on the action.and all these people cheering for it talking about how it's about time for america to have free coverage,thats a hoot.talking about how it's about time gov steps in to fix all the price hikes and rip offs from the ins sector.lmao just wait you will find out soon enough that this is not to help anyone this is a way to gain total control of you and to dig deeper into your pockets.