Fact: McCree did not publish his first experimental results since they did not meet is expectations, and he then modified his experimental proceedure to include a baseline using a background continuum spectrum and measuring the results of additive bands of light.

Also: McCree uses 25nm bandwidths in his work, where TP's (Rauber's) work uses 5nm bands just as the CIE Chromaticity and Lumen standards do.

What McCree left out of his work is the spandard responce of adding additional units of background spectrum and observing the results.

What the data tells me (with different references than most), is that Red gives too much of a responce and low end Blue does not give enough compared to the expected responce of a chlorophyl saturated leaf, which approaches a blackbody on trend, negating it's responce curve to a flat line from arround 400nm to 700nm roughly.

So what is the responce we see, if not the photosynthetic responce of chlorophyl (which is actually the doppler affects of a Hydrogen Ion degeneracy pumped through an organic molecular system anyway)?

Find the line were the spectrum ballances phytochrome to your liking and you then have a competely new set of Relative data references.

That's me dancing arround what I can't dump from Rauber's patent yet, but it's more conceptually than I can stear you guys towards.

Take Care, Sal.