Results 91 to 100 of 394
-
10-01-2009, 11:29 PM #91Senior Member
UVb an experiment
Thanks for the info on the uv LEDs.
In that case I have a box of a dozen PAR 38 uvB lamps that screw into standard Edison sockets. When the time comes I hope to more properly ripen my curreny grow if it doesn't completely fill the area (LOL).
OT: Thanks again and :thumbsup:
Forever on the bus....
M.P.
-
10-08-2009, 07:22 PM #92OPSenior Member
UVb an experiment
Qiuck update. Yesterday (Oct 7th) I harvested this last run, it was 8 weeks exact. Got to abt 15-20% amber rest cloudy abt where I like this strain.
UVb has it's most profound influence on the maturing of the trichomes. Just using it for the last 2 weeks made a BIG difference in how fast and even getting to an "amber alert" stage. Last run even at 9 weeks I had no amber. No doubt it would be very easy to quickly over do the ripeness when using UVb.
This next run I will use the UVb during the entire flower period, just like I did before the experiments, to get back to my standard. I also need to get a weight from the last go round to see if only 2 weeks restores the wgt lost wo/UVb.
-
10-09-2009, 11:36 PM #93Senior Member
UVb an experiment
You found the speed... Awsome!!!
-
10-09-2009, 11:43 PM #94Senior Member
UVb an experiment
Originally Posted by oldmac
-
10-09-2009, 11:52 PM #95Senior Member
UVb an experiment
Originally Posted by Dogznova
Now we're working on timing it's application for maximum effect.
At least I am.
OM's gonna irradiate the entire bloom period.
:weedpoke:
No point duplicating, "his words have iron"!
I'm gonna run up the trichs with 660nm. and push for a "carpet of caps all cloudy".:thumbsup:
Then I'm gonna "Tan" 'em with varying lengths of sunlight to see if that color change is cosmetic, or more than cosmetic:stoned:.
Last batches are still curing.
Howzit goin' on Mars?
Aloha.
Weeze
-
10-10-2009, 02:03 PM #96Senior Member
UVb an experiment
Weez... On mars it seems one can seriously increase the speed that's fo sure. But it's the increase in medical properties and flavor that seems to be the real attraction of mars. By manipulating the PAL and PAD time factors my uncle and I have been able to increase our current setup to aprx x 2 .. Let me explain....We were getting aprx somewhere around 15% (medical properties) on a strain that said 22% on the package. Now we are getting every bit of 30% with that strain....Believe it or not.... it's too strong for my uncle at 30%...So one of the ways we are working on solving this dilemma is by using different strains that are rated at aprx 10%-13% (medical properties) on the package and whacking it up to aprx 20%. He likes this medical range for his meds. There is also a plus to using these different strains. They yield a lot more meds for him. But just so you know the MASTERS are increasing the % to aprx x 6.. I know it sounds hard to believe that going from medical properties of 10%-20% too aprx 40%-60% with PAL and PAD light manipulation..... but I'm afraid it's true. Plus the speed at witch it's being done will blow your mind fo sure..
Soon my friends soon.. :thumbsup:
-
10-10-2009, 07:53 PM #97Junior Member
UVb an experiment
Hello All,
Very interesting reading here. I have been researching LED's for a while now and I am getting ready to do a LARGE LED grow.
I am customizing my own 600W LED lights based on the research I have done and there are still a couple of things that I need answers for before I begin.
Can anyone here help me out with this:
I have heard that 660nm Red extends the flowering cycle instead of reducing it. I have heard that it is better to use a combination of 640nm and 630nm instead of 660nm.
I appreciate all input.
-
10-10-2009, 08:49 PM #98Senior Member
UVb an experiment
"I have heard that 660nm Red extends the flowering cycle instead of reducing it. I have heard that it is better to use a combination of 640nm and 630nm instead of 660nm."
Aloha Shintooo
Hearsay, being what it is, can be misleading.
I don't claim to be an expert, but my experimentation indicates that 660nm.
deep red is the most efficient wavelength for cannabis photosynthesis.
(Actually is 657nm. according to the books.)
If, it does indeed extend the flower cycle, that's a good thing for personal grows.
Allows one to really pack on the resin.
So, might take longer, but medically, it's a net win in Milligrams/Gram of active ingredient.
2 cents, please.
Weeze
-
10-11-2009, 07:05 PM #99Senior Member
UVb an experiment
I have heard that it is better to use a combination of 640nm and 630nm instead of 660nm.
Shintoooo, if you get a chance, hunt up that data again if you can find it; let us know if it was backed up by any experimentation or if it's the same "according to established charts that we believe to be reliable" kinda assumptions that I read. (I remember it because it caused me some concern with my design. Glad I disregarded it. :thumbsup
I've done it side-by-side, and with the strains I tested, 660 won hands down over 630nm for resin production-- which is my area of interest.
I'm cornfused about combining 630 and 640 nm reds. You could probably label a lot of emitters either way. (Leds emit a (narrow) bandwidth; not just the "named" frequency, of course.) What reds are you considering @ 640nm?
600W is a formidable complement of leds. You could integrate both frequencies (660 and 630) into different coverage areas and test it for yourself. Whatcha building?Need advice wth plant problems?
Use this form: http://boards.cannabis.com/plant-pro...ing-forms.html
-
10-12-2009, 04:16 AM #100OPSenior Member
UVb an experiment
Originally Posted by Dogznova
Thanks.
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
An experiment...
By jsn9333 in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 10Last Post: 07-03-2008, 03:25 PM -
Kid Experiment
By MajesticWhelk in forum ParentingReplies: 5Last Post: 04-15-2008, 03:55 AM -
I like to experiment
By Wobster in forum Indoor GrowingReplies: 5Last Post: 03-06-2008, 09:52 PM -
Experiment
By privatepile in forum Basic GrowingReplies: 3Last Post: 11-04-2007, 12:35 PM -
Serious Experiment
By bedake in forum Other PsychotropicsReplies: 12Last Post: 02-15-2006, 01:52 PM