Quote Originally Posted by Rangerbob
The names, lets face it, are "meaningless". ?

To some of us the names are more than a marketing ploy. They are a way for us to keep straight the breeding that was started in the 60's and 70's.

If a friend gives me a clone of White Widow, I can look for information about that strain, and I can look for other people who have experience growing it. Can't really say you could do that back in the day.

I would hypothesize that 90% of the strains we are smoking today came from your weed back then. If that is true, then does that mean that all the breeding and selection that has been done since has isolated worse plants than you smoked back then?

Humbly, I don't think so.

If you are smoking what you are smoking because of a name, I feel bad for you. The name is just there so if you find something you like, you know what to ask for again.

My intention isn't an argument, but this isn't the first time someone has said that weed has gotten worse over the years. But all the reports I read, scientific or otherwise, indicate that marijuana is significantly stronger on the whole than it was years ago.

Just one growers opinions...
irydyum Reviewed by irydyum on . When Pot was truly Pot, and now it's not ! Ok, after a twenty year plus absence of smoke (we used to call it) and now back on the scene, Why the hell does all the various name calling and overhype make it appear that 90% or more of what people are growing or smoking is pretty much all the same stuff. Yes I've been properly intraduced to various forms of the new bud genomes, and smoked a few buds of unknown orgin. Truth be told though, not impressed with any of it. Even the Kush, or Haze, Rhino etc...blah,blah,blah. Absolutly, no Rating: 5