ANARCHY

[mellow mood]

well people must understand that anarchy is the extreme opposite of violence and chaos. thats what, years after years, that ppl started thinkin, because the society, in general, think we need a governement to live. so when u hear anarchy, u think no governement, and then comes chaos. BEEP!! thats the point of anarchy: living peacefully without any fuckin corrupted governement brainwahing everybody in sayin he protect us but we all know in fact hes corrupted, he cares about oil, and he really thinks makin semi-automatic guns available anywhere will protect people, or even being so stupid that he needs to have all his speechs wrote by some cocky deputies, and hes so rich he dont care about anybody cept himself and his butthead deputies fuckin cock sucker corrupted assholes. ok sorry for bad language. and no, i was talkin about everyone except bush

[mellow mood]

is this smiley supposed to mean im sarcastic? no seriously i wasnt, i love bush!

[mellow mood]

LOL

[amsterdam]

i really believe that if there was no government(corrupt or not)people would not be able to handle it and they would go into chaos.people can't even handle a court case without losing there heads.you make it sound good though mellow mood.

[ermitonto]

People seem to have the strange idea that there would be no way of punishing people for their actions under anarchy, as if everybody just freely murdered and stole from each other for the 99.9% of human history that occurred before governments were invented. Back then, such things were decided on a case-by-case basis. The tribe/clan/villagers would get together and work out a solution for each problem that affected the community. Of course this is impossible on such large scales as the modern nation-state where millions of people would render such a system impossible for obvious reasons, but society could be restructured so power is focused on the community instead where people's votes and individual opinions actually matter.

Anarchy can only be achieved if we can undo some of the huge problems that industrial capitalism has brought about so that a society not based on greed and exponential growth can be created. For example, capitalism with its focus on effeciency and producing more, more, more has produced a huge food supply, and anyone with a basic understanding of biology knows that if a species' food supply increases its population will too, so we find ourselves in the predicament of having way too many people. Capitalism tells us the solution is to produce more food to feed all those people, but clearly this is the wrong path since it will only make the problem worse and worse. But capitalism is the only system capable of controlling such huge populations and producing enough food to keep up with the booming population, so practically nobody wants to get rid of it since advocating starvation isn't a very popular stance.

There are three ways out of this mess, and we're going to take one of them whether we like it or not because the simple fact is that we can't support all these people that capitalism has brought about:
1) We can voluntarily lower our birthrate (yeah, right)
2) We can have a giant nuclear war or mass genocide that kills off billions of people (I used to think this was unlikely, but now Bush is in power)
3) We can wait until capitalism reaches the end of the line, that point where its dream of infinite and eternal growth is realized to be impossible, and it can no longer continue due to strains by the humongous population and the inability to extract and deliver resources efficiently enough to keep them alive and willing to work. Billions will die from starvation. This is inevitable if one of the other two doesn't happen, and if we are lucky the Oil Peak will be a catalyst in this destruction of capitalism sometime this century.

After that, then maybe we can establish anarchy. But just because it wouldn't work with today's twisted society doesn't mean I should support the very system that got us into this mess.

[amsterdam]

bush really has killed millions of people hasnt he.lol.those concentration camps are something else.lol

[ermitonto]

Well not yet, but once he starts World War III and you've got Chinese nukes landing in your backyard you'll see.

[koshea]

since china and the usa are allies i doubt that


i remember back in around 7th grade when everyone was an anarchist, and then they realize it was a dumb ass fucking idea

you know the united states judicial system goes on a case by case basis but theres so many cases they keep going...our government isnt bad...shit i wish there was anarchy for a day so you can come back to this republic we live in today and kiss bush's ass for being there

[juggalo420]

Well not yet, but once he starts World War III and you've got Chinese nukes landing in your backyard you'll see.

then we couldnt pay the 13 year old chinese girl (who works 12 hours a day to make barbie dolls for american girls) with only a bowl of rice and a dollar a day.

[mellow mood]

eh u said it. and plz koshea u may not beleive in anarchy but that doesnt say its a shitty kid idea ok respect differents opinions