LOL. DUDE! I love this question.

You don't know how many times I have pondered offshoots of this very same hypothetical. MIne were always how many midgets, how many mini versions of me, etc. NEver w./five year olds.

It's going to be more than ten. For just about anyone. Five year olds are still not very developed not just in terms of strength but also motor skill; not to mention the psychological advantage you would have on them.

Their advantage is obviously the swarm- but if the hour training doesn't instill this well enough, you can sit back and punt the few that come at a time.

There is apoint at which NO ONE can overcome a swarm of ANY aggressors, if there are enough of them. IF they just keep coming and coming on you, you are going down eventually. I am also 6'2 two hundred plus, but I don't think I could take on an infinitity of them. THink about it, if they lined up FOREVER, you could keep punting them, but eventually you would at least have to sleep or take a dump. THey will get you, it's just a matter of time.

Epic- I loved the detail you put into the rules of the challenge, and sampling the participants. I like how the selection pool is 2x the challenge number. That means (assuming equal sampling of girls and boys), either the weakest of the possible boys will be among your challengers, or the group must include girls.

You could pick one up and use him as a club to beat the rest of them w/. Or pick up smaller ones, and throw them at the rest of the attackers (though not very energy efficient). Although if knocking them unconscious dq's them for once they wake up, I am going with kicks, preferrably to the head. If I am wearing boots, I am guessing about 30 I could safely take.

I would put even odds at me vs appr 50.