I do not support your study and I don't believe many others here would either if they took a moment to see what your study is.IMHO this is an attempt to create a unique plant that produces THC and is patentable.

Once a drug company has a patent on a plant that isn't cannabis that produces THC,they will make the case that cannabis should remain illegal because they can now produce the active ingredient with out cannabis changing its legal classification.So they end up with the only legal path to THC($$$) and cannabis remains illegal .

We have a plant that produces THC already and there are methods that can extract nearly pure THC already from that plant(budder),no genetic alteration needed.