You assume an awful lot.
You assume they are guilty.
You assume they were caught in combat
You assume they are terrorists.

Once more I will ask "How does that equate with the very American edict of innocent until proven guilty" ?

If a member of your own family was accused of a crime would you advocate the use of torture ?

How can you trust any information given under those conditions ?

Are you not trying to blur the lines by saying it's okay to torture certain people but not others ?
Where do you draw the line ?
Should waterboarding be used in all investigations , hell why not go back to the old days of policing and get out the rubber hoses.

Do you understand that you cannot denounce an act that you yourself are commiting , regardless of who the victim is ?