I had a good burn session one day and remered a thread I saw where a member bashed on foul mouths and even mods that permit it. This got me to thinking about my take on "foul" language. Me personally I think they are just words meant to convey a more highted expression. Who was the guy that decided to put letters S, H, I and T together to give a more intense "nickname" to describe this natural yet some how taboo bodily function. Who then decided that these or any descriptors or simply "letter combinations" we use to communicate, were unacceptable for others. Who was the literary expert that drew the line just after "dookie" or "poop"? This word is one example but I think this applies to all words IMO. This just seems to be a common sense principle. some people have different tastes and methods of every aspect of life. If is not for you, do what you choose for "yourself". Why must we spend time being judgemental of such simple things. Doing so seems the same as prohibition, wether it be cannabis or any other herb or spirits. Using the KISS method.... what kind of power hungry yutz decided that only a few select "elite" were allowed to let their barley, hops, rice, fruit, or potato ferment or, no one was permitted to put a flame to an herb they found growing? I always try to be kind and respectful of others but honestly...If you dont like to fight, walk away..if you dont like drugs, dont partake...dont like to see, dont watch...hear, dont listen....yada yada. Just "Deep thoughts with Jack Handy" lol Whats your thoughts
cannakeeper Reviewed by cannakeeper on . "foul" language....is it really or just words I had a good burn session one day and remered a thread I saw where a member bashed on foul mouths and even mods that permit it. This got me to thinking about my take on "foul" language. Me personally I think they are just words meant to convey a more highted expression. Who was the guy that decided to put letters S, H, I and T together to give a more intense "nickname" to describe this natural yet some how taboo bodily function. Who then decided that these or any descriptors or simply Rating: 5