what was really interested in was provoking solid obversations about the inequality and social disruption caused quite directly by marijuana prohibition. Things like economy why is that day after day the gov are willing to justify prohibition against those most easily disrupted, it might cost $20,000 dollars or more (based on theory) to process a domestic grower nevermind man hours, despite actually engaging in war which it is my belief is a protectionist stance defending trade routes? Am I wrong? and what of positive opinions for the use of drugs socially - they keep you warm outside, all that... and especially inequality in terms of financial resource, the rich grow dope, that is for sure but tower block new york can she keep her nose clean for long enough to bun a herb? not easily with ganja by weight on the street and some sort of luminary proposition of stratification in terms of wealth, the rich get more numb? and the poor get thinner at a positive level of composure is it a conspiricy?:thumbsup:
anaacid Reviewed by anaacid on . you didn't get it off me, alright? Drug law, that we are incapable of controlling our behaviour, despite the nicities of molecular metaphor; what is prohibition, the obstructive control of material? Why is this substance exclusive, who is curtailed by this exclusion, who benefits from this exclusion and what right is there of authority defined by this probable infraction of the human rights to infringe :smokin:freedom of understanding all elements of the universe. Prohibition is of course for the mutual benefit of specific Rating: 5