Quote Originally Posted by DreadedHermie
Crap. Forgot about that one. Oh, well, I'll remember it now.

Now we're even and I'm back playing defense.

Actually, it's a little worse than that, but, could be worster still, could be rainin'

I'm sure you'd like do a queenside castle, but you're gonna hafta move that bishop. So I'll protect where you might wanta move to and set up a short pawn chain...

P - K Kn 4
You really should retract and reconsider that move. brah

There is no "pawn chain" , yet, and IF you did that, I would simply capture that naughty, and unprotected, pawn with the bishop and have black's bishop developed to an excellent square while snapping up a pawn..

That would allow black, a Queen's side castle giving simultaneous check and you would be 2.5 moves behind.


There are better moves...:thumbsup:

Fer instance, moving youre white Bishop to your Q3 would keep my king's pawn from advancing and driving your Knight from an excellent square.


That would have been a wasted move, (moved the knight twice!), that would give black a substantial time advantage.

Black would be about a move and a half ahead of white.

So, I hope you re-consider, because this move is critical. and could lead to an early and undistinguished demise.


Disclaimer:
I could be wrong.


Aloha,
Weezard
Weezard Reviewed by Weezard on . Calling out to DreadedHermie for a game of "stoner chess" P - Q4 For all who wander by, kibbitzing and commenting is encouraged.:S5: Weezard Rating: 5