Quote Originally Posted by Stemis516
laughable logic? i consider it laughable to compare a beaver dam to humans spewing manmade greenhouse gases into the environment at a pace never seen before

the majority of your posts in this thread are laughable...you can chalk to it to me believing the media or in lies made up by whomever but i have looked at the facts and you cant deny the effect were having on the environment is on a scale that this planet has never seen b4 in its history and you have posted nothing to convince me otherwise

you seem to think that politics and policy making or anything really is just one big philosophical argument that can be won simply by manipulating rhetoric and using your apparently elite lawyer skills to win on paper...there are empirical facts you cant just ignore because you want to
First of all, the most abundant green house gas is water vapor, the media, nor the politicians ever mention that however considering it would be difficult to reduce it. However, regardless of that fact, they still promoted cars which released water vapor as opposed to CO2. How exactly does that benefit the environment when water vapor is far worse according to nearly all sources.

The question is if any of these gases cause long term effects on our environment? As of yet they haven't, not in the form of planetary warming anyway.

The fact is, global warming is not being exacerbated by man, if it is occurring at all.

This is a chart from a top meteorologist.

Here is one chart of global temperatures.

Here is one regarding the ice caps getting thinker.

Here is one regarding what I was saying about DDT.
(This site matches mimics the information found in Michael Crichton's State of Fear. If you would like his bibliography to double check the sources, you can buy or borrow his book from someone.)

I can tell your mind won't change easily, so why should I do a lot of work?

For good measure, here is one regarding DDT found in a medical journal.

Another

Here is the EPA press release announcing the ban. (Assuming you automatically believe the government, you will accept this a proof they were right without doing further research.)

Here is one final link where children debunk global warming.(Scroll down to the first video.)

The fact is. They take a few anomalies and try and make a case for global warming despite opposite effects in other parts of the world. They claim the increase in natural disasters is proof when there isn't actually an increase. The number of hurricanes for instance has not risen at all.

One more. Here is a link from the National Hurricane Center.(For the U.S.)
(Do you notice more in recent years? I don't.)

I am trying to include a picture, I'm not sure if it will work though. If not here is the link.

You can see that yes, the number of hurricanes have increased, however they have spiked several times since we first started recording them. Can you honestly this this proves global warming? A lot of articles I come across believe it does.

Is that better, I will try and refrain from "lawyer talk."

By the way, I don't see how a beaver dam is much different. Beavers divert entire rivers. I don't think the comparison is off base.