Results 21 to 25 of 25
-
04-24-2009, 06:35 PM #21OPSenior Member
I love how the budget deficit has nothing to do with Obama...
Originally Posted by epxroot
-
04-24-2009, 06:39 PM #22OPSenior Member
I love how the budget deficit has nothing to do with Obama...
Originally Posted by epxroot
as well. If we eliminated the FDIC, private companies will pop up and citizens can pay premiums to have an amount they want protected. People who never have more than $300 in their account really don't need protection, and people with a lot more money need more than $100,000 protected.
-
04-25-2009, 01:24 PM #23Senior Member
I love how the budget deficit has nothing to do with Obama...
Originally Posted by JaggedEdge
-
04-26-2009, 03:17 AM #24Senior Member
I love how the budget deficit has nothing to do with Obama...
Note: I am without a doubt the most capitalist of anyone on this site. I live and breath free market theory:jointsmile: Now....
This system is not equipped to function in a free market state. The welfare/disability expenditures allocate resources in what might be, the most inefficient manner possible. In my family, i have 3 relatives that completely rely on government aid, and would be utterly in the gutter without it. Keep in mind, two of these three think of themselves as competent individuals, until you ask them why they do not have/or can hold a job. And of course, they only bank at a pawn shop/check cashing store. The third is truly disabled, although they will never admit it until you ask the same "job" question. To a point, our welfare system is needed, but not in the victim based fashion we have now.
The US also promotes free trade while its chief trading partner uses a double currency standard, that distorts the yuan by depreciating it against the dollar in a two limit band. Their population however, does not use this currency as a medium of exchange withing its economy, otherwise they would have 25% inflation or even greater. While it is true that the Chinese have allowed it to float a bit, the use of a double limit band is entirely centralized, and is on the opposite end of free trade. And yet, we will never end our trade with China because it keeps prices down.
Taxation feeds government activity. Even in states, the solution to budget deficits never really seems to encompass a reduction of spending. As the most efficient maximizer's of resources and credit are taxed on their success, the least efficient (whether or not it is their fault or not) have their poor economic decisions subsidized (welfare state). Just as many would site government bailing out big corporations as moral hazard, that has a tendency to facilitate failure inducing risk, so does providing unlimited assistance to the poor. In fact, it is my belief (although i have not studied the subject enough to actually confirm) that higher levels of taxation reduce the amount of charity donations (although economic recessions do as well). Regardless, the majority of voters are not rich, and it is of the interest of specific politicians to appease the majority for the sake of job security. Personally, i would have no objections to welfare if those who received it were not allowed to vote in elections. Reason be, if the only source of my income came from a political system, would i ever hold any issue in higher regard? One could mistake it as a form of political bribery. This is why i support a national sales tax.
There are many more reasons as to why we cannot be a free market. But given the situation, without a central bank like the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States, the lack of freedom in a market modeled on it will face constant depressions. When things get bad, people as a whole will spend less, and hoard currency. As this persists, trade flow begins to deteriorate to the point where more and more jobs are lost, and a race to the bottom is created. Dollar denominated assets fall with prices with desperate attempts to entice potential buyers with lower prices. Wage deflation follows.
If Ben Bernanke did not enact full scale quantitative easing practices (invoked inflation), prices would have far more than they already have. Not just prices for food, but the values of houses purchased in the past (with contractual obligations to make fixed payments) along with wages, retirement accounts, and demand in general.
Without a free economy, allowing ours to act as though it is free, without a central banking authority, will lead to constant deflationary price spirals that cause economic depressions.
-
04-26-2009, 03:25 AM #25Senior Member
I love how the budget deficit has nothing to do with Obama...
Originally Posted by epxroot
Which is why i agree with you. Less RV's, means less people making them, means less groceries, energy, and entertainment: this cycles into further job cuts.
Oil demand has fallen from over 1 billion gallons per day (20 million barrels) to about 900 million gallons per day. With a 10 to 1 inventory relapse possibility (every ten days our oil inventories can replenish one day of demand), cuts in world oil production took place.
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
MORE GOP BUDGET HYPOCRISY - Extend Bush Taxs cuts for wealthy no matter the deficit
By eastbaygordo in forum PoliticsReplies: 1Last Post: 07-14-2010, 04:04 PM -
Obama's 3.8 Trillion Deficit for 2010...During Freeze?
By Islandborn in forum PoliticsReplies: 6Last Post: 02-02-2010, 01:57 AM -
Budget Deficit Hits High Times
By Galaxy in forum Current EventsReplies: 1Last Post: 05-21-2009, 06:10 PM -
Europe shows love for Barack Obama - unfortunately it has no vote
By Breukelen advocaat in forum PoliticsReplies: 1Last Post: 06-27-2008, 02:13 AM -
Deficit down,Trade up!
By amsterdam in forum PoliticsReplies: 7Last Post: 07-15-2005, 06:07 PM