Quote Originally Posted by DdC222
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Ahhh...but by extention, does this give him the right to wave his gun at the police?
The fourth ammendment rights were not ignored, discarded or pushed-aside. The warrant was legal, and was legally served.

It is sooo like your type to dismiss the personal responsibility issues this raises as nothing more than big brother stormtroopers conspiring to blow this fuckers head off. Unsound reasoning, misleading and factually inaccurate.

Quote Originally Posted by DdC222
What is this world coming to? People are shot by police for growing a plant that God placed on this earth. The police have to answer on this one and not slap the hands of the killer.
No, he was shot for waving a gun at police. He got what he obviously wanted, and I gurantee the cop will have a full clip, the next time he's on patrol. :thumbsup: