628. Hong Kong as payment (3/7/2010)

Hong Kong is part of the payment to China in this plot.

1. Five legislators of Hong Kong resigned early this year to call for a referendum to give public the voting power to elect the Administrator of Hong Kong. That is against the will of Chinese government. They prefer a puppet Administrator elected by an appointed delegate. Just at this time, the democratic party in Hong Kong splits. The effort of the five legislators fails.

2. A prominent dissident of Hong Kong - Si Tu Hua, who is famous for supporting the students of Ti An Men Square, was pronounced having cancer last month.

All these were the work of the intelligence, I think. These are political payment. There is financial payment, too.

Quote, "February 2, 2010, 03:46 PM ET

Hong Kong Court Awards Wang Fortune to Foundation

Following a nearly nine-month trial that gripped Hong Kong's news media and business world, a judge ruled today that the estate of Asia's wealthiest woman should go to the charity she founded rather than to her alleged lover, Bloomberg reports.

The Chinese city's High Court upheld a 2002 will awarding Nina Wang's fortune -- estimated by Forbes to be $4.2-billion at the time of her death in 2007 and valued as high as $13-billion by Hong Kong news media -- to the family-run Chinachem Charitable Foundation. A 2006 will produced by Tony Chan, a feng shui master who claimed to have had an affair with Ms. Wang, was ruled invalid.

Ms. Wang inherited billions from her husband, Teddy Wang, a property magnate who was declared legally dead in 1999, nine years after he was kidnapped."

http://philanthropy.com/blogPost/Hong-K ?ang/20999/

Teddy Wang, a billionaire, was kidnapped in 1990. His body was never found. After he was declared legally dead by the court, there was a fight for his wealth between Teddy Wang's father and Teddy Wang's wife - Nina Wang. (Teddy Wang and Nina Wang had no children) Nina Wang finally got the estate of Teddy Wang, though the court had judged she faked the will of her husband. Nina Wang signed a will in 2002 that the estate she owned would be given to "Chinachem Charitable Foundation" after her death.

Charitable foundation is usually used as a cover up term for the organization of intelligence. The famous international speculator, Soros, operates with "charitable foundation".

Nina Wang died of cancer on 4/3/2007. After her death, Tony Chan stood out to compete for her estate. Tony said he was a secret lover of Nina Wang and he held a will of her which was signed on 10/16/2006. Tony Chan also said the 2002 will was signed by Nina Wang as a tactic to get Chinese government to influence the court of Hong Kong to favor her in the inheritance case.

The timing of case is coincidence with the framed drug case. On 9/21 to 9/23/2009, the lawyers of two parties gave the closing argument in court. That was the time of attempt Iran war. (see "612. War crisis in September (10/29/09)") The judge said the verdict would be given in the end of the year. That was coincident with another attempt of Iran war. In September crisis, Iran was given an ultimatum of three months.

Anyhow, the plot didn't go through in December, so the verdict delayed too. On 2/2/2010, the Chinachem charitable foundation won the case but still couldn抰 touch the estate. The judge didn't give any order on the inheritance process.

Legally, Tony Chan might appeal before 2/28. Now the judge approves to extend that appeal date for one more month. What for? I think they are waiting for the result of March plot. (see "626. Iran war - Part of the March plot (2/21/2010)") China has to do some service to receive the payment.


629. Attack the Euro (3/13/2010)

Since Iran abandons dollar for Euro in its oil trading, a weak Euro would significantly hit Iran's economy. I saw in each attempt to have a war on Iran, it used to be followed with a plot to hit the Euro. The typical samples were: In January 2007, Russia had a dispute with Belarus and shut off the oil pipe for several days. In August 2008, Russia invaded Georgia where there was gas pipe line to Europe. In both events, if the crisis broadened, The oil and gas to Europe would have been cut. The European's economy would have been hurt and Euro would have depreciated. So would be Iran.

See "462. The collapse of Euro and worldwide economic crisis (1/20/07)", and "565. Georgia war and Russia, their role in Iran war (8/19/08)"

The resource to sabotage the Euro by the failures of energy supply exhausted. The plan to have war on Iran doesn't go through yet. What's next? We see the international financial speculators again.

You may have noticed that started from later January, the financial crisis of Greece became a hot topic in media. In article "The Bond Vigilantes who left Greece in Ruins" (Business Week 2/22/2010), the writer says, "On Feb.10, striking labor unions shut down schools.....

As of Feb. 10, European officials seemed to be angling for a compromise plan to aid Greece but on such harsh terms that no one else would want such a deal. .....

In the month through Feb.10, the yield on the Greek government's three-month bills soared from less than 1% to 4%....."

The timing reminded me of the Feb. 13 Chinese New Year's dinner plot. The Greek's financial problem was created for that plot. If the 2/13 plot went through, then there would be "terror attacks" which would have justify the war on Iran. At the same time Iran would have suffered a blow in its finance too - a devalued Euro. All these didn't go true because the 2/13 plot went soured.

Who created that crisis? In a meeting with President Obama on Mar.9, Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou called for a clampdown on financial speculators he blamed for worsening his country's situation. Who are those international speculators? Goldman Sach was picked up particularly: "Goldman stars in this Greek tragedy - The firm's currency and bond deals for Greece have drawn fire" (Business Week 3/1/2010)

Russia had disputed over its neighbor countries(Belarus, Ukraine, Georgia) with attempt to shut down the oil and gas supply to Europe. Now it's the PIG'S four countries. (Greece, Ireland, Portuguese and Spain). They will appear in turn to pull down the Euro once there comes a renewed Iran war plot.




630. Earthquake in Haiti and Chile (3/22/2010)

Twice the Feds had applied earthquake technique in their framed drug case on me. One was the 8 magnitude quake in Peru on 8/15/2007. The other one was the 8 magnitude quake in Sichuan, China on 5/12/2008. Find the detail in my article:

"503. Earthquake in Peru (8/18/07)" and "552. Setting off an earthquake is a mature technique (6/14/08)", "553. Sichuan quake used as a diversion (6/19/08)".

When three earthquakes took place in my area early this year, I was aware there was another big case framed. The three quakes that alarmed me were:

1. 1/7, 10:09 a.m. at east Milpitas, 4.1 magnitude quake. "Jolt felt across Bay Area" (Bay Area News group 1/8/10)

2. 1/8, 11:48 a.m. at east Milpitas, 3.7 magnitude quake. "Inn case you didn't notice, the joint was jumping" (Mercurynews.com 1/9/10)

I was in library and strongly felt when these two quakes happened.

3. 1/9, 4:27 p.m. at Humboldt, North California, 6.5 magnitude quake.

Then:

4. 1/12 A big earthquake in Haiti killed more than 200,000 people.

On same day, Google threatened to exit China, citing of highly sophisticated cyber attack alleged done by Chinese government. I knew the new plot was in action. I wrote "621. Big plot in later January (1/16/2010), Reminded people of a coming framed drug case, that there would be a big Internet attack and possibly a big earthquake to come.

5. 2/26 In Chile, 8.8 magnitude quake.

I think the two big earthquakes were used to justify a planned earthquake in California where I live. The Haiti quake was prepared for 2/13 Chinese New Year's plot. When it failed to go through, the Chile quake was prepared for 2/26 to 3/13 travel plot. The disaster would distract public attention on a framed drug case. I allege at same time there would be false flag terror attack in US and Europe to provoke a war on Iran. One thing for certain is my articles would have been eliminated in a massive "Internet attack". My revelation is too true to exist for the Feds.