Al Qaida works for US intelligence

[kathaksung]

Al Qaida (or most other terrrorist group) exists where US intelligence dominates. Al Qaida in US when Bush needs excuse to activate Mid-east war. That is 911 attack. Al Qaida is everywhere in Iraq now to bomb innocent civilians when US occupies Iraq. Strange to say, under the Saddam regime, there was no Al Qaida. Al Qaida seems only exist where the regime being controlled by US. So we see no Al qaida in Syria and Iran. But they appears to attack ordinary people when the government either is controlled by US intelligence or supported by US intelligence. That's why you see Al Qaida attacks in US, in Afghanistan, in Pakistan, in Iraq (after it is occupied by US). Because where they are protected by the intelligence, worked as a whip to beat people. When government want money and power, they beat the people with this whip (Al Qaida terror attack) People feel hurt then give up their civil rights and money to the government. DOJ got the Patriot Act and Pentagon got budget and Mid-east war.

kathaksung Reviewed by kathaksung on 02-16-2009. Al Qaida works for US intelligence Al Qaida (or most other terrrorist group) exists where US intelligence dominates. Al Qaida in US when Bush needs excuse to activate Mid-east war. That is 911 attack. Al Qaida is everywhere in Iraq now to bomb innocent civilians when US occupies Iraq. Strange to say, under the Saddam regime, there was no Al Qaida. Al Qaida seems only exist where the regime being controlled by US. So we see no Al qaida in Syria and Iran. But they appears to attack ordinary people when the government either is Rating: 5

[MaryJaneMonkey]

Take the anger you feel, multiply it by 10 and you will feel what a dusgruntal Marine feels like after being deployed to Iraq.
It amazes me how a country like America functions when 98.6% of people dont agree with the direction we are headed.

Of and FUCK THE VA!!!!!!
throwing poisonous pill after poisonous pill down the throats of people who thought they were doing something to help the cause.

In fact, Al queda is no terrorist group in my eyes. THey do not have billion dollar bombers to fight with and pay for by the us taxpayer money so they use home made bombs. Yeah it sucked having to see young girls get blown up by "terrorist" or freedom fighters, but I see where they are coming from.

I realized the error in my ways, hopefully America will do the same.

I appologize to the people of Iraq, even though I was very respectful of their customs when I was there, tried to get as many of them help as I could.
Shit, bough them soap and shampoo with the majority of my check.

People are people, everyone wants the same thing, a job, a family, some peace and quiet. We are a lot less different than we assume.

It just amazes me that we have control of Afghanistan, 90% of heroin comes there, and when Marines wanted to burn opium fields, higher ups said no.

[kathaksung]

Al Qaida is created by Pentagon and US Intelligence as a false flag target with which they squeeze money and power from people.

Quote, "Al Qaeda does not exist and never has
8/19/2004

The basic truth is that Al Qaeda does not exist and never has. Al Qaeda is a manufactured enemy who was created by the Bush Administration in order to have an excuse to wage a war for the control of the world's oil resources.

Did an American even hear the words "Al Qaeda" before 9-11? Or were we told that its alleged leader Osama Bin Laden has family who themselves have personal business relationships with George W. Bush's family and that both families had financially profited conside

Al Qaeda does not exist and never has - Pravda.Ru

[Delta9 UK]

"Al Qaeda" is actually "the base" - referring to the Database of Mujahideen fighters setup by the CIA to fight the Russian invasion of Afghanistan.

Robin Cook wrote about this in the Guardian shortly before his death:
Robin Cook: The struggle against terrorism cannot be won by military means | UK news | The Guardian

From the same article:
"Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally "the database", was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians. Inexplicably, and with disastrous consequences, it never appears to have occurred to Washington that once Russia was out of the way, Bin Laden's organisation would turn its attention to the west."

Just throwing in some facts - make of it what you will.

[Breukelen advocaat]

"Al Qaeda" is actually "the base" - referring to the Database of Mujahideen fighters setup by the CIA to fight the Russian invasion of Afghanistan.

Robin Cook wrote about this in the Guardian shortly before his death:
Robin Cook: The struggle against terrorism cannot be won by military means | UK news | The Guardian

From the same article:
"Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA and funded by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally "the database", was originally the computer file of the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians. Inexplicably, and with disastrous consequences, it never appears to have occurred to Washington that once Russia was out of the way, Bin Laden's organisation would turn its attention to the west."

Just throwing in some facts - make of it what you will.

For something to be a "fact", it generally has to be regarded as true. Bin laden never worked for the CIA, and was never funded by them. This story is a myth.

[Delta9 UK]

For something to be a "fact", it generally has to be regarded as true. Bin laden never worked for the CIA, and was never funded by them. This story is a myth.

How can you be sure? I think Robin Cook (as Secretary of State) had a higher security clearance than either of us

[Breukelen advocaat]

How can you be sure? I think Robin Cook (as Secretary of State) had a higher security clearance than either of us

Using that logic, then you'd have to agree that anything George W. Bush, former president of the U.S., says has "higher security clearance" than Cook. :jointsmile:

Seriously, there's no evidence to support the claim that bin Laden was CIA trained and supported.

[Delta9 UK]

Using that logic, then you'd have to agree that anything George W. Bush, former president of the U.S., says has "higher clearance" than Cook. :jointsmile:

LOL - you got me there BA :thumbsup:

The CIA did supply the moojies in Afghanistan though, without that support they wouldn't have been able to lure the Soviets in - which is exactly what they did. The Russians fell for the trap and had it handed to 'em - that I'm sure we can agree on.

Who else handed them those 'handy' Stinger missiles that started swatting down Soviet Hind Gunships and Hip transports?

[Breukelen advocaat]

LOL - you got me there BA :thumbsup:

The CIA did supply the moojies in Afghanistan though, without that support they wouldn't have been able to lure the Soviets in - which is exactly what they did. The Russians fell for the trap and had it handed to 'em - that I'm sure we can agree on.

Who else handed them those 'handy' Stinger missiles that started swatting down Soviet Hind Gunships and Hip transports?

It was Jimmy Carter that first started supporting them ("moojies"). The Soviets were not military "invaders" in the general sense, they were invited in by the legitimately elected government of Afghanistan. The reforms put forth by the (Marxist) Democratic Republic of Afghanistan, in the 1980â??s, were disliked by Muslims. These included outlawing on beards on men, banning burqas on women, and mosques were off-limits. At least they got that right.

[killerweed420]

Not much doubt that CIA's fingerprints are all over Afghanistan and Pakistan. They have involved themselves in a lot of shady deals for decades.