Quote Originally Posted by Gotabud
It isn't 5-6oz:1oz; it's 8-9oz:1oz*
Also, it isn't calling a steak a steak. It's paying $15 for a Filet Mignon from an "okay" restaurant instead of $150 for a steak that may only be twice as good from a top-of-the-line restaurant. Even if it clearly tastes better, has been taken care of, is more emotionally satisfying, it still isn't really worth anywhere near the money, and the people who choose to buy it will always be grossly overpaying. The difference is that nug is sold at a market value that is supposedly at least somewhat worth it.

So have we all agreed that "garbage weed" is, at worst, 10% potency (as described by seedbanks; I don't really know what exactly that means), and that, on average, nug will probably only double that (20%)?


Assuming THC content was relatively the same, the highs should have very similar durations, unless you can identify any other specific reasons to suggest otherwise.

What do you mean by "stress headaches"? I would assume that if commercially grown crop gave you headaches over nug, it was probably the "additives" that you spoke of.

Smokable weight per oz might actually be lower in nug, even considering the seeds in commercial, since the strong odor and sometimes even stickiness indicates it wasn't properly dried.


I'm trying to prove that the difference in highs is mostly just the placebo effect. Yes, I felt like I could tell the difference between commercial and nug, but I was also always informed before coming to that conclusion, so I was expecting a difference.

Also, speaking from experience is deceptive for the very reason I'm trying to prove. YOU are not a credible source, because you are under the impression there really IS a difference and therefore are far more likely to fall victim to the placebo effect. (You = general audience)


A l33t smoker is a "seasoned pro," a "veteran," etc., who takes on an elitist attitude. Anyone who claims to be a l33t smoker better know what they're talking about or admit when they're unsure, otherwise they'll look like a fool when they're proven wrong. I guess experience hasn't taught them as much as they thought . Also, do your math right. It isn't paying 75% more... It's paying 750-900% more...
BWHAHAHAHA... dude, all i can do is laugh.. you sir are a douche. I can tell by your posts. Anyone that says they are an "elite" smoker is just as queer as you are. You are not going to "prove the placebo effect" because you are wrong. In fact, just by reading your response to posters, you are clueless. Keep going by your scientific methods and your hypothesis and all that shit because you are wrong. plain and simple. I'm done wasting my time on you, goodbye!

btw, way to catch the sarcasm when i said "75%" I couldnt give a shit how much more it is, the fact is, if it was just a placebo effect, people wouldnt spend their time or money trying to get better pot or grow better pot if the same was achieved from brick weed. Also, I've been smoking everyday for about 7 years and I've never heard of anyone claim themselves to be a l33t smoker, this isn't some gay internet language we are talking about pal. I seriously would love to meet you some day just so I could laugh at you. hahaha what a clownnnn

now I will go smoke my NUGS out of my bong and get my placebo high... goodbye now! hahaha:rastasmoke: