Results 31 to 37 of 37
-
03-21-2010, 01:53 AM #31Junior Member
What is meant by "commercial" weed?
Lmao.. No one uses l33t smoker. Sorry, I guess it went over your head, but it was me making fun of people like you. And I quote:
Originally Posted by RelaxaBIT
But feel free to laugh and pretend like you have any kind of argument.. People like you get ripped off daily and think they're in heaven with slightly more potent weed. Oh, it's sticky? I'll pay even more for it! Who cares if I'm getting even less than I should because it wasn't properly dried? Come to think of it, I disproved almost every argument you made. I guess somebody got a little embarrassed.
That's okay. There are going to be a lot of embarrassed l33t smokers, like yourself, when we can finally cut through the ignorance in the world's stoner community and combat exploitation of naive customers, also like yourself.
If anyone else wants to chime in with an objective explanation, please do... Like I said before, this is the #2 listing on a google search for "commercial weed," so it's the best place to get this figured out.
(P.S. I've been smoking for 6 years, almost 7.)
-
03-21-2010, 02:56 AM #32Senior Member
What is meant by "commercial" weed?
All I know is neither one of you can hold a candle to Majesticman . . . :S2:
-
03-21-2010, 04:56 AM #33Junior Member
What is meant by "commercial" weed?
Gotabud is quite right in his deduction. Prices now are the direct result of a naive, perhaps ignorant, wave of cannabis smokers.
-
03-21-2010, 10:31 AM #34Senior Member
What is meant by "commercial" weed?
Originally Posted by Gotabud
So have we all agreed that "garbage weed" is, at worst, 10% potency (as described by seedbanks; I don't really know what exactly that means), and that, on average, nug will probably only double that (20%)?
Assuming THC content was relatively the same, the highs should have very similar durations, unless you can identify any other specific reasons to suggest otherwise.
What do you mean by "stress headaches"? I would assume that if commercially grown crop gave you headaches over nug, it was probably the "additives" that you spoke of.
Smokable weight per oz might actually be lower in nug, even considering the seeds in commercial, since the strong odor and sometimes even stickiness indicates it wasn't properly dried.
I'm trying to prove that the difference in highs is mostly just the placebo effect. Yes, I felt like I could tell the difference between commercial and nug, but I was also always informed before coming to that conclusion, so I was expecting a difference.
Also, speaking from experience is deceptive for the very reason I'm trying to prove. YOU are not a credible source, because you are under the impression there really IS a difference and therefore are far more likely to fall victim to the placebo effect. (You = general audience)
Also, do your math right. It isn't paying 75% more... It's paying 750-900% more...
I do agree that the prices are way inflated, so grow your own and you'll be spending the same amount on an oz of your own as you would be on buying shwag, assuming you have some skill and know what's necessary to get and what's not in regards to equipment & nutrients & all.
-
03-21-2010, 01:22 PM #35Junior Member
What is meant by "commercial" weed?
hahaha seriously, i'm still laughing at this guy over here... and I dont know why you're quoting "l33t smokers" like i said I was one, because I didn't. Like i said, anyone who even brought up the term l33t smokers is a huge douche ( I have a pretty good idea it was you) Second, i'm not going to sit online and argue to you about something I know is a fact. I know what gets me high,the type of high I get, and I know that your assumptions are way off. Just take some time to read the poster above me and a few others to educate yourself. Also, i'm just curious, if you can yield the same amount of THC content out of the mids that you can with the dro or dank, why would anyone waste their time and money to grow a product that only "looks pretty but doesn't get you any higher or a diff type of buzz" ?? can you tell me that? I mean if the mexican brick weed had 15-20% thc in it, then no one would fucking grow the other shit because it would be just as easy and less of a hassel and less time and money. I don't give a SHIT what my weed looks like dude, I care about how my shit smokes. I do know that the brick weed doesn't usually exceed a THC content of over 4-8%. In a nice bud that was grown with care and creates more tricomes yields upwards to 15-20%. You are assuming everyone thinks like you or feels the same way you do because of how you feel when you smoke. Because just like anything, it can effect you different than it might others. Also, I have been an everyday smoker for 7 to 8 years. Ive actually been smoking since I was 14, but not everyday like I am now. So I guess you can count that 11 years so i'm not fucking stupid and I draw my own conclusions. And I do know that I wouldn't pay extra money from dro or dank if the fuckin schwag that pedro and his cat piss on were to get me an equal high to that of say a "jack herrer" strain. PLacebo effect or not, I know as soon as I hit the bud if the THC content is high or not just by the feelings in my lungs.
Also, to these other posters responding to my posts, I never once claimed to know more than anyone else or be a big shot smoker, I mean really who gives a shit? I don't know anyone of you, so i couldn't care less what you think.
This placebo bullshit is what is wrong
-
03-21-2010, 01:27 PM #36Junior Member
What is meant by "commercial" weed?
Originally Posted by Gotabud
-
03-21-2010, 01:32 PM #37Junior Member
What is meant by "commercial" weed?
Originally Posted by redtails
I to agree prices are inflated, I never said they weren't. But I don't agree with what this poster is saying. He is basically saying you only buy dro and dank because It's pretty and "sticky" and not because it gets you any higher or have any differen't effects than the mids or brick weed. He's saying it's all in your head.. You are wasting your money buying the higher quality stuff because it's no different and it's just the "placebo effect" kicking in.. I'm sorry but I know this is wrong, and i'll argue this until I die... Anyone who honestly thinks this, has no idea what they are talking about.
Advertisements
Similar Threads
-
Commercial weed vs nug
By Gotabud in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 2Last Post: 03-22-2010, 02:17 AM -
safe to ingest commercial weed?
By MedusaGrower in forum RecipesReplies: 2Last Post: 09-18-2007, 04:22 PM -
Thai/Commercial Weed. Just a quick Q.
By jokeyjokejoke in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 14Last Post: 09-05-2006, 08:58 PM -
New Anti-Weed Commercial
By dopefiend in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 18Last Post: 08-21-2006, 04:22 AM -
teh latest anti-weed commercial....
By yoda in forum GreenGrassForums LoungeReplies: 12Last Post: 02-19-2006, 07:01 AM