Aloha Sal,

If you don't have the 4/10/10 etc. posts handy.
I'm pretty sure I had the good sense to save the e-mail with real info.
Let me rummage around here and see what I find.

Ah! here's one:

"Remember you're all studing genetics verses environment here, so it is very important to separate the two, when interpreting results.

I hope you realize, that in spite of the fact that We're watching you repeat what we've done (for the sake of our education on How you think, we're studing YOU studying the plant, and there are no wrong answers in this respect of OUR interpretting YOU and your psyche's), your journey here is identical in our eyes to as if you were the first growers trying to grow indoors under artificial lights and the only place you had to start from was from your only know 14/10 Outdoor references. Technology for us in our sad waiting game of economics has become a time machine allowing us to watch (our own and others) histories unfold (through you) for the first time (again... and again).

You started at 12/12 real time, coming from 14/10 SID time (just like they did coming from 14/10 SOD time originally, and not to far off Temporally), asking the same historical question again (as did we), "What will give us the same results as 14/10 SOD (or 12/12 SID)?" But now, just as then, the questions answer is qualitative and existists in mind's eye and the question becomes (just as it did then), "What will give us the same results THAT FEELs as 14/10 SOD (or 12/12 SID) (to us???)?"

Not to worry, but just so you know where some of this comes from:
AND NOW HERE COMES DA PAIN!!! I hate to torture your minds with this, but few think as we do...

When interpreting results from your work (as we do with both it and it relevance to you), try to avoid the assumption that these Techno Environmentally triggerred results MAY GIVE WHAT YOU CONSIDER CONFLICTING RESULTS - IF you assume ("to make an" ass/u/me), that the results are indivisibly linked through a single mechanism (genetic, regulatory or whatever), when in fact it is perhaps just as likely that these individual responces occur in parallel under NATURAL environmental stimuli, but are also separable if triggerred under Artifical laboratory (completely unnatural) environmental stimuli (such as an unnaturally divided spectral stimuli, which is definition of Artificial Darkness's functionallity).

BUT!!! Rather than strain you way through GrandMaster mental gymnastics, take instead the simple tool:

You see that things are related, one to another.
Now simply consider more than two things in this. (Once you relate two things, you can relate other aspects to the first two (if only in character of action, rather than dependence on some action).

AND!!! Before this spirals out of control with sensory overload, remember the saving grace of deduction. Removing those things that are not significant, leaves those things that are.

Determining something can be eliminated from consideration is a thing of joy for brain strainers. Or as Forest Gump put it, "Which is good, like my Momma always says, THAT'S JUST ONE MORE THING NOT TO WORRY ABOUT.

So, don't worry.

If the hairs are light colorred due to strain genetics, don't worry. And especially, if you don't care about the hair color verse things that are more important QUALITIES to you personally, THEN especially don't worry.

Let me worry (I used to be the best worrier on this horrid crash site of a planet). I'll fritter away the Darkness on wether or not spectrum responsive reccessive genetics or regulation that affect pigmentation in the plants and have multiply interdependent and/or independent environmental triggering (they do - remember that THC is a pigment and pigment synthesis is therefore at the core of most investigations in such matters, but also remember that it's all in the trends between this and that).

Just go with the flow (trends). Let us worry about the who came first, the Martian or the Migrain.

And that comes from your friendly neighborhood would be psycho analysis.

P.S. - Take two bingers, and call just call it a morning. (Dr. Feelgood)

-----------------------------------------------------------
420 AD, sounds like 4/(10/10) to me... ...but due to relativity... ...it's ALL Ancient History (AH - Ah Ha) you see. (AD, ND, AH, SID, SOD... ...even the abbreviations are turning into an epic.)

Mother - I'd add more AD, rather than exchange for ND, but that's just me (starting and looking back on a 0/24 perspective going in the other direction, not 12/12).

Do what YOU ARE going to do, that's what we're here to see, and you guys give great SHOW! And I promise the last half hour of this flick is worth it, I've seen more times than I can count and it never gets old.

The fact that you are getting flowering at all (+- an hours or so of real time SID equivalency), DOES NOT agree with the pseudoscience of the established yet untested assumptions on photoperiodism in vascular plants - this is were the mandate of throwing out the old and using the new in REAL SCIENCE prevails over assumption. For it is the assumption of Empirical Science (Real Science) that we can be mistaken, and the power of Empirical Science to document (admit) and learn from failure (accept).

I only wish there were more of a mandate to publish failures, but failures are less in demand than the more sensational "successes", and admittedly humans tend to be rather shy about their so called failures. And so we find ourselves with successes based on missassumption, and lacking failures pointing towards the Holy Grail of TRUTH (for this is the quest of all true science, not success).

Thanks goodness we fail to succeed, how else could we hope to defeat the barriors of assumption and find ourselves were Truth may reveal itself to us, if we can simply stand our ground long enough for it to reveal itself - SM.

Keep up the work and the good results, which is your fine honing of the skills needed to handle what is coming...

Techno Shock is denial, denial is based on assumption. Assumption is the bug. Denial is the symptom. And, SHOCK is needless sufferred, if at all.

Thanks you all for your effort, it may not lead us to the answers We want, but I sure could hurt (anything but Our heads).

Take Care, Sal. (You're getting there!)
***************"

Got choke!
Which ones do ya need and how do ya wannem?

Regards Weeze