Results 1 to 10 of 12
Threaded View
-
11-12-2008, 08:40 PM #3
OPSenior Member
Future stimulus package
Of course there is:jointsmile:
Originally Posted by maladroit
That is because: 1. It was much too small. 2. It was really a tax rebate. In that case, there was a rather low multiplier effect, due to the nature of the rebate (skips step 1), and high demand to pay off debt.the first $170 billion stimulus earlier this year failed
I do agree. Yet the budget went off balance after 911, along with the recession. Those are not exactly "good times" so to say.governments should operate on a surplus in good times (and pay debt down) and, if necessary, operate on a deficit in bad times...that hasn't been happening for for the past 40 years or so and the accumulated debt plus the abnormally high deficits are limiting choices...sooner or later, americans are going to pay the full price...maybe it will hurt less if they stretch out the payments over 40 years at an attractive introductory interest rate (subject to increase to market rates)
A super stimulus (greater than or equal to $1 trillion) is needed to prolong the eventual demise of this Keynesian wet dream.
Similar Threads
-
Texas Used Stimulus to Cover 97% of Its Deficit
By bigsby in forum PoliticsReplies: 4Last Post: 01-26-2011, 03:54 PM -
Obama's Failed Stimulus Cost More Than Iraq War
By Islandborn in forum PoliticsReplies: 18Last Post: 09-04-2010, 07:39 PM -
Obama Begs for Another 50 Billion $ Stimulus
By Islandborn in forum PoliticsReplies: 4Last Post: 06-14-2010, 11:29 PM -
CBO:Stimulus 75 Billion More Expensive Than Expected
By Islandborn in forum PoliticsReplies: 1Last Post: 01-27-2010, 07:22 AM -
So much for the 800 Billion Dollar Stimulus
By Islandborn in forum PoliticsReplies: 14Last Post: 11-24-2009, 05:28 AM










Register To Reply
Staff Online