I think that if anyone thinks they are superior to someone just because of the fact that they smoke weed and the other does not, then that is a blatant definition of ignorance and stupidity. Anyone who thinks smoking weed makes them superior to someone who does not is a complete tool.

This takes me back to intro to philosophy.

To begin this argument, you need to define what is superiority. There's actually way more you must define. You have to rewrite plato and socrates and redefine value, morals, etc.

This argument is non sequitor, or a logical fallacy.

I call BS!