Quote Originally Posted by headshake
i agree 100%! i was simply stating that it could possibly be a step in the right direction.

-shake
I agree that it could be a step in the right direction - but if legalization (and associated regulation) is considered radical, then shouldn't decriminalization be considered even more radical?

Think about some of the arguments for prohibition:

1) The gateway effect. We can all agree that to some degree the prohibition of Marijuana is a gateway policy, forcing consumers into a black market to purchase a popular product. It is this same black market that can provide more elicit and more dangerous substances. Decriminalization of small amounts for personal use without allowing for a legal market in which to purchase doesn't address this problem.

2) If you smoke weed, you're supporting terrorism. Again, this is a question of the black market versus a legal regulated marketplace. We all know this claim is a bunch of bull, but if the proponents of prohibition actually believe their own words then once again we should point out that only establishing a legal regulated market can eliminate the mass flow of funds into an untraceable black market.

Isn't allowing anyone to possess up to 3.52 ounces of weed which must be purchased illegally, grown illegally, or smuggled illegally into our country far more radical than allowing it to be grown and sold legally in licensed stores to adults?

I find it strange that decriminalization is seen as a step toward legalization when its effects would certainly be more radical.
IAmKowalski Reviewed by IAmKowalski on . Obama and decriminalization? Well i didnt vote for him but o well i kno with him theres a better chance of moving in a better direction for mj users. What do yall think the chance of a federal decriminalization with him in power is? Rating: 5