Quote Originally Posted by JaySin
With all the different candidates, why the heck do we get only one vote?

This makes it so there are few supporters for the candidates that could actually make our country prosper (Ron Paul), and the people that vote for them only take votes from the front runner that shares a lot of the same views. If they didn't purposely set it up like this, then they sure are taking advantage of it. Which is why it need to be changed.

You should get a primary vote and a secondary vote. That way I could vote for Ron Paul and then cast my secondary vote for Obama. That way I can make sure that my vote for Ron Paul doesn't just lose a vote for Obama to McCain. Cause Obviously Ron Paul isn't going to win, but I DEFINITELY DO NOT want McCain winning just because I supported someone that should actually be president instead of the two people they parade around as if they are the only two candidates.
Are you serious?? they have a hard enough time with the simple "one man, one vote" concept, and most of the folks counting the ballots can't count higher than 6 without having to take off their shoes... and now you want to add to the confusion?? then there are the voters themselves.... we are not talking about the best of the best...... right Chad??