Quote Originally Posted by gypski
A card could violate the doctor-patient relationship by giving access to those who don't really need to know your condition(s). Especially in a state data base. We all know they can't protect their data bases and they also sell them. Bad, bad idea in my opinion. No privacy. The authorization should be recognized and LEO be on his way with a small sample. A forged authorization doesn't have the necessary appended and attached paperwork, and you need to confirm your identity with proper ID.
I totally agree gypski. Our constitutional regime of privacy here in Wa. under article 1 section 7 is why our legislature never did set up a registry system in the first place. Just because LEO and the executive branch continue to manifest untenable ambiguous arguments does not give rise to a card registry system.

Our legislature knows that a sample taken under the WSP guidelines is just 1/10th of a gram. A picture and a sample is enough to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt here in Wa., any amount is the rule of law. LEO's excuse of destruction of evidence is without merit.

A forged authorization is obvious if the signed Dr. never did sign or the patients medical records do not exist.