okay seriously i do not wish ill on anyone or anything, but im too fed up with people who EXPECT to be given better benefits for having a higher responsibility job. im not going to reword it, i would greatly appreciate if the greedy folk just disappeared one day.

bosses that make more than their collective employees should be shot, and survivors shot again, end of story.

authority positions are obligatory based on the need for such positions to be filled, not the arbitrary individual needs to do it. these positions are more difficult and as an incentive to attract someone to fill the position, more luxuries are offered to the person.

that's wrong right from the get-go. we shouldnt be paying luxurious wages to anyone who cannot prove themselves worth those wages! let the CEOs work just like the employees: from the bottom rung of the ladder up.


new ceo? new pay. rather than payoing the new CEO the same as (or more than) the LAST CEO, pay them the minimum until they EARN those big bucks.

you dont earn respect in the work place with a fancy degree, or a track record, you earn it here and now with what you do or dont do.

you dont offer prizes to ensure a job well done, you offer prizes FOR a job well done!


and OFFER. you OFFER THEM OF YOUR OWN FREE WILL. the prizes are a CHOICE made by the WORKERS. not that it works like that, but that's how it ought to work, considering if we pay them to do a good job BEFORE the job is done, what ensures that they will even make the effort? you cannot gaurentee that they will be honorable and keep their word. sure, you could have faith in them, and then when they take away all your benefits, dip into the 401k, and lay off 50% of the employees, just shrug it off and say "oh well", OR you can just not have faith in them at all until they have proven themselves competent and beneficial to the company's best interests, and not their own.


Who are you to say what's rewarding? Personally for me.. I like making plenty of money. I can pay my bills.. and enjoy luxuries that I wouldn't be able to afford on a lesser salary.
ah yes, that's the clincher though, isnt it?

the bigwig who gets to sit behind a desk and go through all the stress of protecting investors is more deserving of luxuries and medical care than the workers who are risking their saftey in the shop, producing parts, running big machines, and physically meeting the company's needs. it doesnt add up. the company is a single thing, all parts of the company are of equal importance.

honestly, when i said they deserve less, iwas just ranting. to be honest, no one deserves any more or less than anyone else. we are all human, we are all doing what we need to do to survive, and yet somehow we are not all equally afforded comforts. somehow we place more and less value on people based on what? what their job is in society??
what is it that determines how a gas pump attendant just barely affords food, while the texaco CEO has more food than can be eaten by an entire starving family?!


the whole point of my argument is that priorities are misplaced and the balance of society is too far tipped to one side.


i got into it in a rage, and said things out of hate toward the general mentality of greed, but my point remains unchanged. can you look past the anger and see that i only mean to say that we are human, we are all human, we all got pulled out of some woman's vagina, so how is it that we are not all equal?


and of course, i am also protesting the reliance on currency. without currency, everyone is a worker, and everything we do to survive is work. survival is the paycheck.

we should do things for the sake of getting them done. not for the sake of a paycheck or extra toys for getting them done. that's inflation.

if we are to expect to get more than the job affords us in exchange for completing a job, then we're on the fast road to exhausting our resources.


in other words, if you are expecting to get paid anything more than you farm, you're a fool.


i do not see any benefits of currency that outweigh the ills it causes, no more than i see any benefits from corporations that outweigh their monopoly on economics.

the shame, however, still lies on those who are trying to "get ahead".