Quote Originally Posted by delusionsofNORMALity
i can't say as i blame you. i'm sure that you, along with most everyone else, have been brainwashed into believing in the need for the massive bureaucracy that is sucking dry the citizens of this country and doing their best to enslave us as they consolidate the power we so willingly abdicate to them. i'm certain you see the concept of anarchy as a wilderness with no rules and no law but the law of the jungle (much like the streets of many of our cities after the sun goes down). i have no doubt that you find the average person incapable of governing himself. that is, after all, the only reason we should endure these uncaring bureaucracies supported by the sweat of the people they claim to represent.

it's a pity you stop listening when you hear that someone may advocate an ideal so different from the reality you desperately cling to. it's a pity that most people refuse to listen to the idea that humanity is capable of ruling itself without the buffer of a million civil servants to water down the truth of what the people really need. if they bothered to listen and to think we might have fewer ignorant souls who cannot see beyond the mundane lies of their masters, who are capable of forming opinions based on something a bit more real than video games and the daily show.
Do you really think a million civil servants focus on watering the truth? That is quite delusional.

It's not like anarchy is a non-existant concept. There's plenty of anarchists applying their views. East Washington State is a prime example. They got their communities where they support themselves through marijuana traffiking, armed themselves to the teeth to protect themselves from the outside world. It works, it's self-sustainable for those that choose to participate in those communities.

But my question is how could you apply anarchy on a widespread scale of 300 million people and be feasible?