f*uck :/ knna, I'm sorry. actually I think it's not that way you wrote - think some ppl found it too clever and/or need some time to 'metabolize' the infos. me personally just have no time at the moment and temporarily stopped writing in all threads.
I know it's bitter and I feel bitter often when trying to talk about leds with ppl I know. esp marketers cause a frustration
and I do appreciate your work! and the par energy calculator was smth that impressed me
anyway, while thankful for the thread, my focus is not on the photosynthesis rate but on the photoreceptors driving specific responses, esp. flowering. I promised much to the ppl in the other thread long ago and still play with the papers, but want to gather as much I can and present it fully, then I reveal another and another and it goes deeper, dont know when to stop at certain level to systematize and present it, so I read read and don't write,
plz don't take it personally at least me is interested and appreciating! also have to admit I really learned from you. If you expect polemics, for the moment I say imo photosynthesis rates are much less important than ppl think, as leds usually do good veg and little buds. and in the photoreceptors realm there are many things already and widely not considered theories, and web is rich in it. secondly, that is rather a question than a polemic: do you have any prove that plant needs only a certain amount of blue and not a proportion to total light? not talking about pores or stomatas opening and stetch blocking, but 'bout all other responses?
ps. nice to see an European here!