Quote Originally Posted by JakeMartinez
I'm sure you do thorough background checks on anyone you associate with. Never know in this day and age who's considered a terrorist.
Well considering that none of my friends or people I know are WELL KNOWN terrorists.. No I don't. You're right, but again There's a difference between a self acknowledged terrorist and someone hiding in the shadows. I'm not sure how you were trying to argue your point with this statement.

This argument is absurd on all levels. But, if you want to say this shows a major lapse of judgment, then what about McCain and the Keating 5? Just because he got let go doesn't mean that he wasn't guilty of associating with the other scandalous senators.
Let's use people on cannabis.com in the legal forum as an example of poor judgement. "Should I drive with weed in my car?".... "Should I hire a lawyer?"... "Should I be driving while smoking at the same time.". Example of time after time of bad judgement. Sorry, but if you choose bad person after bad person to enter your life and then choose to leave them there then you are just asking for trouble. It doesn't mean that you yourself are a bad person, just pretty darn stupid for keeping them in your life.

And you're right, it doesn't mean anything just because he was let go. Maybe Obama should bring that up.

I get the sense that between this post and your post on the other thread that you are taking this personally. If you are and you continue you can't blame me if I decide to have a little fun with you. Keep it up



I guess it's just not that political since it's easy to find out everything you want about the Keating 5, but Obama-Ayers is a mystery so it's more appealing.
Which brings to question.. Why is it a mystery. Why would something so seemingly innocent have to be kept under wraps.

And again, how can you be tough on terrorism and yet be friends with a terrorist.

Probably more bothersome to me is that you defending an unrepentant terrorist, but that is neither for this thread nor these forums probably. I just feels it reflects on you poorly. However you're not running for any office so I could care less


Especially to attack-dog politicians.

Oh, by the way, I may support Obama but I'm still skeptical about any controversy either candidate has. I always want proof, not conjecture.
Could've fooled me with your eagerness to defend a man without seeming to investigate any of the controversy surrounding him. Your arguments are weak and give the impression that you support Obama regardless of what questionable acts may arise.

Blind faith in democratic leadership.

You can say you want proof, but fact is that it doesn't matter what argument or evidence that's brought to light.. you will run to defend Obama. You have done it in just about every thread that might have something negative to say about him.

I on the other hand have called McCain a bumbling fool on several occassions.

Contrary to what you may want to believe I am not really bias'd. My candidate didn't win the major Ticket. I'll be hoping he chooses to run in 2012.

I'll be looking forward to your next defense for Obama. They amuse me :hippy:

"NO YOU CAN'T SAY THAT ABOUT OBAMA!!!"