that's a mighty fine two step...i can label myself without it being a strawman fallacy because i know myself...you don't know me, so you cannot correctly label me a socialist or a somnabulist

obama isn't a socialist either (more strawmannery)...george bush just took control of the means of production on wall street so you could correctly label that policy socialist, but i think even george bush still has more capitalist than socialist in him...by itself, government intervention is not socialist...the US government and other governments around the world intervene in the free market all the time, but private property still exists in america, and american capitalists retain control of the means of production (until last month anyway)


this is an interesting observation:
"Furthermore, there are many socialist aspects at work such as universal health care, in that most, if not all devoted socialists believe it to be superior to a localized free market alternative. Better has yet to be defined by acceptance universally."

- are you saying universal health care is not superior unless it is accepted universally? most of the developed countries in the world have publicly funded healthcare systems, and the US health care system lags behind a few dozen universal health care systems of other countries...better has been defined, and universally accepted outside of the usa

US health care system ranked 37th in the world:
WHO | World Health Organization Assesses the World's Health Systems

US health care system scores low marks compared to other countries:
Health Scorecard Ranks U.S. on Lower Rungs -- AAFP News Now -- American Academy of Family Physicians