Quote Originally Posted by flyingimam
[B]
Now the kid or his guardian have no proof or evidence to back their claim up. It's just malice and u know it. don't argue over something that u @ heart know about.

and I agree there are some claims against bush that are pure malice as well without any backup.
I can find a way to link Obama and terrorists preferring him and I'll do it if you ask me. It doesn't matter how solid it is as it would be an open debate... which in essence would throw defamation out the window.

It basically doesn't matter how flimsy it is. It's pretty much been determined that you can say anything you want about a person in the public spotlight without having to worry about it.

Why are you so defensive. I simply posted a supreme court ruling. I'm sorry but your argument for defamation is invalid. It's as simple as that.