Quote Originally Posted by Gandalf_The_Grey
There's a kookie old lady in my old (small) hometown who has been writing about chemtrails in the local paper for years. The problem with most of these theories; moonlandings, chemtrails, crop-circles etc, is that folk hear one long and compelling argument followed by a "My God, that proves it!", when it should be followed by a "damn, that seems to prove it, can I find arguments to the contrary?"

Look at the Fox special on the moonlanding being faked. It's really well presented, it's VERY convincing, and tons of people have watched it gone "OMG! That's indisputable!" But there are those of us who actually researched further, checked the counter arguments and, sure enough, they can blow Fox and their bullshit away.
You should stay on the topic, what's being discussed is chemtrails not the moon landing. Your broad, all or nothing thinking about conspiracies is faulty. There are conspiracies that are admitted & historical fact such as Gulf of Tonkin incident, Iran Contra and Operation Gladio to name a few.

In response to the topic here's some pretty definitive proof for chemtrails:

Newscast's Chemtrail Investigation Reveals Dangerous Aerosolized Compounds

Also the government is now starting to admit it:

U.S. Government Scientists Geo-Engineer Atmosphere

Those are from Alex Jones affiliated websites, so some misguided people (who are sometimes referred to as 'sheeple') may say "that automatically means that it's fake", even though Alex Jones' sites have a far better track record of accuracy than the evening news. But in the articles there are hyperlinks to a mainstream news report in the first one & government sources in the second.