Vermont candidate to prosecute Bush if she wins

[rebgirl420]

I'm glad Daihashi and delusionofnormality are here to put some common sense into this thread.

What a ridiculous notion to get votes. I dunno, how about instead of pandering to a crowd who hates a lame duck president how about we get our priorities straight and focus on the real issues.

Maybe b/c Charlotte Dennett is just as crooked as any other politician. Wasting time and resources for something so stupid is insane. She should be tarred and feathered 1776 style.

[dragonrider]

This seems like a big grandstanding ploy that has no basis in reality.

If they want to try Bush, they'll have to do it in The Hague, not Vermont! It's not going to happen either way, so it's a bogus issue if you ask me.

[Psycho4Bud]

However! however, as it is a known FACT Bush was elected not by the people but by the system. no1 can deny that!

Hasn't the same thing happened as of late with Clinton/Obama? I thought this would have been a dead issue with the dems now.

Have a good one!:s4:

[SnSstealth]

Hasn't the same thing happened as of late with Clinton/Obama? I thought this would have been a dead issue with the dems now.

Have a good one!:s4:

zzzzzzing!!!:jointsmile:
whiskeytango

[delusionsofNORMALity]

on individual basis u cant blame everyone, many were opposed to it and made their fullest efforts to make their voice heard and things changed, that's why i blame the system and this includes their blind supporters

oh how my heart bleeds for those who strive to make their voices heard amidst the corruption (can you feel the sarcasm and derision dripping from every word i write?). excuse me while i tune my violin. while the partisans are playing their silly games and standing in the rain for a chance to boo their rivals, they are merely playing their part in the perpetuation of a broken system. the blindness encompasses both sides of the aisle, as well as each individual who claims "i've done my part".

What a ridiculous notion to get votes. I dunno, how about instead of pandering to a crowd who hates a lame duck president how about we get our priorities straight and focus on the real issues.

i find it quite apt that when you look up the term pandering the first definition you read is - To act as a go-between or liaison in sexual intrigues; function as a procurer. the orgasmic displays of approval for the expressed hatred of the opposition are particularly sexual in nature and absent of the deliberation you would hope would accompany a thoughtful discussion of the running of the country. while the left engages in its orgiastic game of laying the woes of the world at the feet of the present administration, they are countered by an equally absurd display of nationalistic glee from the right. the game goes on and absolutely nothing is done about what really ails the country.

If they want to try Bush, they'll have to do it in The Hague, not Vermont! It's not going to happen either way, so it's a bogus issue if you ask me.

of course it won't happen. to try one petty tyrant for his imagined crimes, they would have to indict every government for their real crimes. they would be forced to admit that the true cause of government is to enslave its people or be seen as the hypocrites they are.