Parts of site failed to load... If you are using an ad blocker addon, you should to disable it (it blocks more than ads and causes parts of the site to not work).
His first day just happened to be on the night McCain was to make his speech. Trying to steel the thunder but according to recent polls it didn't work out that way. Lets see what shift they take after the 4 part interview is over with. Hell, he might even of been the cause of McCain having the largest viewing audience out of all the candidates. BACKFIRE!!
I don't think the timing of the airing of the interview was Obama's choice or an attempt to "steel the thunder." That was up to the show. It was actually taped on a different day, wasn't it?
Originally Posted by Psycho4Bud
Ya know, I watch Hannity, O'Reilly, Olberman, etc. to try to get a balanced view, or maybe different perspectives. Hannity, far right....Olberman, far left; you know who these people are voting for. With O'Reilly, I've seen him come to the defense of Obama against the right on his show more than once. He's as much of a fan of the right wing as McCain; somebody that might swing to the right on issues but sure is a pain in the ass!
I almost always watch CNN, which I do not think is very biased. But someone mentioned how funny it was to flip between FOX and MSNBC for the conventions, so I started doing that. It is surprisiong how biased they both are. CNN had pretty much neutral reporters running their coverage, with biased pundits from both sides and even campaign people from both sides there in a secondary role for biased analysis. It seemd pretty balanced. But both FOX and MSNBC had their coverage HEADED UP by their opinion people. They had analysts from both sides, but the lead anchors for the convention shows were people who run their own biased opinion shows, not even pretending to be neutral reporters. I thought that was wierd.