Quote Originally Posted by daihashi
It's not that.. it's that by definition a Theory is something that is not proven as true. So regardless of your argument.. any scientific theory is still a theory and not fact.

You can have all the models in the world but it doesn't make you right unless you can prove it.

Science and creationism are in the same boat essentially no matter how you roll the dice. Science is just in the better position to win this fight, and probably by a landslide at that. :hippy:
Exactly. Theories are not absolutes. At anytime it could be debunked. Big bang theory could be 100% wrong, but at this current time it's the best explanation we have until further answers are sought. One time, the conventional theory was the earth was flat. But the basis of that was from what we saw at the present time, conventional wisdom. It was based on what people saw. There were no further avenues at the time to prove otherwise. Then of course, it became fact that the world was round and it was debunked.

The difference though between theories like the big bang, and creationism is there's far more basis for it. For example, can we prove that Moses was alive? Did he leave behind some possessions that could be carbon-dated. The process of the scientific method in creationism is lacking.