Actually Pahu, you havent come up with a credible arguement yet. No recent evidence, you certaintly havent replied to any of my posts with backup evidence after I counter your view. Your latest post stinks of racism and close mindedness.

I am not impressed with your debate capabilities, but if you want to continue your fools argument no one is stopping you. Just keep the personal attacks to a minimum, and try to find some solid, RECENT evidence for what you have to say. I personally would like to see something from the last 20 years that is not taken out of context to back up what you are saying.

I am an open minded person, and I consider new facts as they come, which often change how I see the world. Its called learning. Please, teach me if you see fit. Otherwise, I think Ill stick to proven theories from the latest information I have, especially when they are proved by people much smarter than I.
carinia Reviewed by carinia on . Science Disproves Evolution Compatible Senders and Receivers Only intelligence creates codes, programs, and information (CP&I). Each involves senders and receivers. Senders and receivers can be people, animals, plants, organs, cells, or certain molecules. (The DNA molecule is a prolific sender.) The CP&I in a message must be understandable and beneficial to both sender and receiver; otherwise, the effort expended in transmitting and receiving messages (written, chemical, electrical, magnetic, visual, and auditory) will Rating: 5