Quote Originally Posted by Coelho
I think this argument is enough to prove that life could NOT appear by itself just by chance.
Coelho - you might want to read this article:
Self-Reproducing Molecules Reported by MIT Researchers

It's all about self-replicating molecules & this isn't even new science.

Granted it gets rejected by creationists but then again they usually leave common sense at the door anyway - but I know you are a Physics dude so you should be able to get your head around it no problemo. For more information rty searching for "aminoadenosine triacid ester" - that should give you plenty of references.

This isn't 'absolute proof' of anything, especially abiogenesis but it is a bloody good start and imho a lot better than the usual 'goddidit' argument peddled by creation "science" (an oxymoron if I ever saw one) or ID or whatever-the-fuck they have rebadged it into this week.
Delta9 UK Reviewed by Delta9 UK on . Science Disproves Evolution Compatible Senders and Receivers Only intelligence creates codes, programs, and information (CP&I). Each involves senders and receivers. Senders and receivers can be people, animals, plants, organs, cells, or certain molecules. (The DNA molecule is a prolific sender.) The CP&I in a message must be understandable and beneficial to both sender and receiver; otherwise, the effort expended in transmitting and receiving messages (written, chemical, electrical, magnetic, visual, and auditory) will Rating: 5